Literature DB >> 3452362

Prenatal care utilization: its measurement and relationship to pregnancy outcome.

G R Alexander1, D A Cornely.   

Abstract

This study proposes a redesigned measure of prenatal care utilization based on modifications made to a preexisting index of the adequacy of such care. Six prenatal care utilization groups were delineated: intensive, adequate, intermediate, inadequate, no-care, and missing/unknown. Using 430,349 cases from South Carolina and North Carolina vital records from 1978 to 1982 (live birth-infant death cohort files for white resident mothers), this proposed prenatal care utilization measure was examined by maternal sociomedical risk characteristics (age-parity, marital status, education, complications of pregnancy, and previous pregnancy terminations) and by pregnancy outcomes (birth weight, gestational age, and birth weight- and gestational age-specific neonatal mortality). The intensive prenatal care group had relatively more pregnancy complications but also the most preferred pregnancy outcomes. Appreciable differences in birth weight and gestational age distributions were observed among the prenatal care categories within maternal risk status groups. Increased utilization of prenatal care was associated with higher mean birth weight and gestational age. However, after controlling for maternal risk status, an appreciable variation in birth weight- and gestational age-specific neonatal mortality was not apparent across prenatal care groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3452362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  57 in total

1.  The role of medical problems and behavioral risks in explaining patterns of prenatal care use among high-risk women.

Authors:  L L Clarke; M K Miller; S L Albrecht; B Frentzen; A Cruz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Prenatal care use among selected Asian American groups.

Authors:  S M Yu; G R Alexander; R Schwalberg; M D Kogan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Area-level predictors of use of prenatal care in diverse populations.

Authors:  E Kieffer; G R Alexander; J Mor
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 4.  Migrant women's utilization of prenatal care: a systematic review.

Authors:  M Heaman; H Bayrampour; D Kingston; B Blondel; M Gissler; C Roth; S Alexander; A Gagnon
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-07

5.  Single motherhood and neonatal survival of twins among blacks and whites.

Authors:  Hamisu M Salihu; Leia M Chatman; Amina P Alio; Muktar H Aliyu; Russell S Kirby; Greg R Alexander
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Pregnancy outcomes of US-born and foreign-born Japanese Americans.

Authors:  G R Alexander; J M Mor; M D Kogan; N L Leland; E Kieffer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Mortality among twins born to unmarried teenagers in the United States.

Authors:  Hamisu M Salihu; Caroline K Mbuba; Olatunji J Oluwatade; Muktar H Aliyu
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-09

8.  Clustering of U.S. women receiving no prenatal care: differences in pregnancy outcomes and implications for targeting interventions.

Authors:  Cathy R Taylor; Greg R Alexander; Joseph T Hepworth
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-06

9.  Source of bias in prenatal care utilization indices: implications for evaluating the Medicaid expansion.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M E Tompkins; D J Petersen; J Weiss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Selection bias in prenatal care use by Medicaid recipients.

Authors:  Janice F Bell; Frederick J Zimmerman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2003-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.