Literature DB >> 28786063

Association between prenatal care utilization and risk of preterm birth among Chinese women.

Bin Zhang1, Rong Yang1, Sheng-Wen Liang2, Jing Wang3, Jen Jen Chang3, Ke Hu2, Guang-Hui Dong4, Rong-Hua Hu1, Louise H Flick3, Yi-Ming Zhang1, Dan Zhang1, Qing-Jie Li2, Tong-Zhang Zheng5, Shun-Qing Xu6, Shao-Ping Yang7, Zheng-Min Qian8.   

Abstract

It is recognized that prenatal care plays an important role in reducing adverse birth. Chinese pregnant women with medical condition were required to seek additional health care based on the recommended at least 5 times health care visits. This study was to estimate the association between prenatal care utilization (PCU) and preterm birth (PTB), and to investigate if medical conditions during pregnancy modified the association. This population-based case control study sampled women with PTB as cases; one control for each case was randomly selected from women with term births. The Electronic Perinatal Health Care Information System (EPHCIS) and a questionnaire were used for data collection. The PCU was measured by a renewed Prenatal Care Utilization (APNCU) index. Logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Totally, 2393 women with PTBs and 4263 women with term births were collected. In this study, 695 (10.5%) women experienced inadequate prenatal care, and 5131 (77.1%) received adequate plus prenatal care. Inadequate PCU was associated with PTB (adjusted OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.32-1.84); the similar positive association was found between adequate plus PCU and PTB. Among women with medical conditions, these associations still existed; but among women without medical conditions, the association between inadequate PCU and PTB disappeared. Our data suggests that women receiving inappropriate PCU are at an increased risk of having PTB, but it does depend on whether the woman has a medical condition during pregnancy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  moderate preterm birth; prenatal care; prenatal care utilization; preterm birth; very preterm birth

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28786063     DOI: 10.1007/s11596-017-1779-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci        ISSN: 1672-0733


  20 in total

1.  Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Infant care practices in rural China and their relation to prenatal care utilisation.

Authors:  B I Nwaru; Z Wu; E Hemminki
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2011

3.  Antenatal visits and adverse perinatal outcomes: results from a British population-based study.

Authors:  Stavros Petrou; Emil Kupek; Sarah Vause; Michael Maresh
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2003-01-10       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Modifying effect of prenatal care on the association between young maternal age and adverse birth outcomes.

Authors:  C L Vieira; C M Coeli; R S Pinheiro; E R Brandão; K R Camargo; F P Aguiar
Journal:  J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 1.814

5.  Application of the Kessner and Kotelchuck prenatal care adequacy indices in a preterm birth population.

Authors:  Joan Rosen Bloch; Katy Dawley; Patricia Dunphy Suplee
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.462

6.  Risk factors for preterm birth and small-for-gestational-age births among Canadian women.

Authors:  Maureen Heaman; Dawn Kingston; Beverley Chalmers; Reginald Sauve; Lily Lee; David Young
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.980

7.  Inadequate prenatal care utilization and risks of infant mortality and poor birth outcome: a retrospective analysis of 28,729,765 U.S. deliveries over 8 years.

Authors:  Sarah Partridge; Jacques Balayla; Christina A Holcroft; Haim A Abenhaim
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  Risk screening for spontaneous preterm labour.

Authors:  Khalid S Khan; Honest Honest
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 5.237

9.  Effect of frequency of prenatal care visits on perinatal outcome among low-risk women. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  R S McDuffie; A Beck; K Bischoff; J Cross; M Orleans
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-03-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Medically induced preterm birth and the associations between prenatal care and infant mortality.

Authors:  Tyler J VanderWeele; Diane S Lauderdale; John D Lantos
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.797

View more
  2 in total

1.  Association between antenatal care visit and preterm birth: a cohort study in rural Bangladesh.

Authors:  Jesmin Pervin; Syed Moshfiqur Rahman; Monjur Rahman; Shaki Aktar; Anisur Rahman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  The impact of antenatal care utilization on admissions to neonatal intensive care units and perinatal mortality in Georgia.

Authors:  Tinatin Manjavidze; Charlotta Rylander; Finn Egil Skjeldestad; Nata Kazakhashvili; Erik Eik Anda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.