Literature DB >> 8417603

A comparison of prenatal care use in the United States and Europe.

P Buekens1, M Kotelchuck, B Blondel, F B Kristensen, J H Chen, G Masuy-Stroobant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to describe prenatal care use in the United States and in three European countries where accessibility to prenatal care has been reported to be better than it is in the United States.
METHODS: We analyzed the 1980 US National Natality Survey, the 1981 French National Natality Survey, a 1979 sample of Danish births, and a survey performed from 1979 to 1980 in one Belgian province.
RESULTS: The proportion of women who began prenatal care late (after 15 weeks) is highest in the United States (21.2%) and lowest in France (4.0%). This contrasts with the median number of visits, which is greater in the United States (11) than in Denmark (10) or in France (7). Across all maternal ages, parities, and educational levels, late initiation of prenatal care is more frequent in the United States, and median number of visits in the United States is equal to or higher than that in the other countries.
CONCLUSIONS: In countries that offer nearly universal access to prenatal care, women begin care earlier during pregnancy and have fewer visits than women in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8417603      PMCID: PMC1694498          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.83.1.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  7 in total

1.  Migration and Western europe: the old world turning new.

Authors:  G Therborn
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Perinatal geography of Belgium.

Authors:  P Vandenbussche; B Dujardin; E Wollast
Journal:  Biol Neonate       Date:  1989

3.  Timing of prenatal care in the United States: how accurate are our measurements?

Authors:  J D Forrest; S Singh
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Impact of the French system of statutory visits on antenatal care.

Authors:  B Blondel; M J Saurel-Cubizolles; M Kaminski
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 5.  Variations in provision and uptake of antenatal care.

Authors:  P Buekens
Journal:  Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1990-03

6.  Annual summary of vital statistics--1989.

Authors:  M E Wegman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  An indicator of adverse pregnancy outcome in France: not receiving maternity benefits.

Authors:  B Blondel; M J Saurel-Cubizolles
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.710

  7 in total
  19 in total

1.  The role of medical problems and behavioral risks in explaining patterns of prenatal care use among high-risk women.

Authors:  L L Clarke; M K Miller; S L Albrecht; B Frentzen; A Cruz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Infant health and mortality indicators: their accuracy for monitoring the socio-economic development in the Europe of 1994.

Authors:  G Masuy-stroobant; C Gourbin
Journal:  Eur J Popul       Date:  1995

3.  Socioeconomic barriers to informed decisionmaking regarding maternal serum screening for down syndrome: results of the French National Perinatal Survey of 1998.

Authors:  Babak Khoshnood; Béatrice Blondel; Catherine de Vigan; Gérard Bréart
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Effects of prenatal care on child health at age 5.

Authors:  Kelly Noonan; Hope Corman; Ofira Schwartz-Soicher; Nancy E Reichman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-02

5.  Temporal changes in socioeconomic influences on health: maternal education and preterm birth.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M El-Sayed; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Predisposing, enabling and pregnancy-related determinants of late initiation of prenatal care.

Authors:  Katrien Beeckman; Fred Louckx; Koen Putman
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-10

7.  Defining reducible risk : Social dimensions of assessing birth technologies.

Authors:  S B Ruzek
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1993-12

8.  Quantifying the adequacy of prenatal care: a comparison of indices.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  High birthweights among infants of north African immigrants in Belgium.

Authors:  P Buekens; G Masuy-Stroobant; T Delvaux
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Class, race, and infant mortality in the United States.

Authors:  C J Hogue; M A Hargraves
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.