Literature DB >> 7862395

Does prenatal care improve birth outcomes? A critical review.

K Fiscella1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate evidence that prenatal care improves birth outcomes. DATA SOURCES: The MEDLINE data base was searched for appropriate studies for the years 1966-1994; a review of published studies was also conducted. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Published observational and experimental studies of prenatal care that met specified criteria were selected. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Studies were graded based on the system used by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. Data were assessed using established criteria for the evaluation of prenatal interventions: temporal relationship, biologic plausibility, consistency, alternative explanations, dose-response, strength of association, and cessation effects. Current evidence did not satisfy the criteria.
CONCLUSION: Prenatal care has not been demonstrated to improve birth outcomes conclusively. However, policymakers deciding on funding for prenatal care must consider these findings in the context of prenatal care's overall benefits and potential cost-effectiveness. Cost-effective reductions in low birth weight deliveries may be beyond the statistical powers of detection of current studies.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7862395     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(94)00408-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  57 in total

1.  How well do we understand the relationship between prenatal care and birth weight?

Authors:  K D Frick; P M Lantz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The role of medical problems and behavioral risks in explaining patterns of prenatal care use among high-risk women.

Authors:  L L Clarke; M K Miller; S L Albrecht; B Frentzen; A Cruz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Early origins of the gradient: the relationship between socioeconomic status and infant mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Brian Karl Finch
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2003-11

4.  Trends in prenatal care use and low birthweight in southeast Brazil.

Authors:  Marcelo Z Goldani; Marco A Barbieri; Antonio A M Silva; Heloisa Bettiol
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  The relationship between prenatal health behavior advice and low birth weight.

Authors:  M R Sable; A A Herman
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  America's Health Centers: reducing racial and ethnic disparities in perinatal care and birth outcomes.

Authors:  Leiyu Shi; Gregory D Stevens; John T Wulu; Robert M Politzer; Jiahong Xu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Timing of enhanced prenatal care and birth outcomes in New Jersey's HealthStart program.

Authors:  Nancy E Reichman; Julien O Teitler
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2005-06

8.  Prenatal care initiation among very low-income women in the aftermath of welfare reform: does pre-pregnancy Medicaid coverage make a difference?

Authors:  Deborah Rosenberg; Arden Handler; Kristin M Rankin; Meagan Zimbeck; E Kathleen Adams
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-06-09

Review 9.  The social determinants of health: it's time to consider the causes of the causes.

Authors:  Paula Braveman; Laura Gottlieb
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

10.  A Call to Revisit the Prenatal Period as a Focus for Action Within the Reproductive and Perinatal Care Continuum.

Authors:  Arden Handler; Kay Johnson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2016-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.