Literature DB >> 10183307

Estimation of seroprevalence, rape, and homelessness in the United States using a social network approach.

P D Killworth1, C McCarty, H R Bernard, G A Shelley, E C Johnsen.   

Abstract

The authors have developed and tested scale-up methods, based on a simple social network theory, to estimate the size of hard-to-count subpopulations. The authors asked a nationally representative sample of respondents how many people they knew in a list of 32 subpopulations, including 29 subpopulations of known size and 3 of unknown size. Using these responses, the authors produced an effectively unbiased maximum likelihood estimate of the number of people each respondent knows. These estimates were then used to back-estimate the size of the three populations of unknown size. Maximum likelihood values and 95% confidence intervals are found for seroprevalence, 800,000 +/- 43,000; for homeless, 526,000 +/- 35,000; and for women raped in the last 12 months, 194,000 +/- 21,000. The estimate for seroprevalence agrees strikingly with medical estimates, the homeless estimate is well within the published estimates, and the authors' estimate lies in the middle of the published range for rape victims.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10183307     DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9802200205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Rev        ISSN: 0193-841X


  32 in total

1.  Social network size in humans.

Authors:  R A Hill; R I M Dunbar
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2003-03

2.  The science in social science.

Authors:  H Russell Bernard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  THE GRAPHICAL STRUCTURE OF RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING.

Authors:  Forrest W Crawford
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2016-08-01

4.  The Game of Contacts: Estimating the Social Visibility of Groups.

Authors:  Matthew J Salganik; Maeve B Mello; Alexandre H Abdo; Neilane Bertoni; Dimitri Fazito; Francisco I Bastos
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2011-01-01

5.  LATENT DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE ESTIMATION IN HARD-TO-REACH GROUPS.

Authors:  Tyler H McCormick; Tian Zheng
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.083

6.  Estimating the Size of a Large Network and its Communities from a Random Sample.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Amin Karbasi; Forrest W Crawford
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  2016

7.  Generalizing the Network Scale-Up Method: A New Estimator for the Size of Hidden Populations.

Authors:  Dennis M Feehan; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2016-09-20

8.  Estimating Population Size Using the Network Scale Up Method.

Authors:  Rachael Maltiel; Adrian E Raftery; Tyler H McCormick; Aaron J Baraff
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.083

9.  How many people do you know?: Efficiently estimating personal network size.

Authors:  Tyler H McCormick; Matthew J Salganik; Tian Zheng
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  Size Estimation of Groups at High Risk of HIV/AIDS using Network Scale Up in Kerman, Iran.

Authors:  Mostafa Shokoohi; Mohammad Reza Baneshi; Ali-Akbar Haghdoost
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2012-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.