Literature DB >> 31607761

THE GRAPHICAL STRUCTURE OF RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING.

Forrest W Crawford1.   

Abstract

Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a chain-referral method for sampling members of hidden or hard-to-reach populations, such as sex workers, homeless people, or drug users, via their social networks. Most methodological work on RDS has focused on inference of population means under the assumption that subjects' network degree determines their probability of being sampled. Criticism of existing estimators is usually focused on missing data: the underlying network is only partially observed, so it is difficult to determine correct sampling probabilities. In this article, the author shows that data collected in ordinary RDS studies contain information about the structure of the respondents' social network. The author constructs a continuous-time model of RDS recruitment that incorporates the time series of recruitment events, the pattern of coupon use, and the network degrees of sampled subjects. Together, the observed data and the recruitment model place a well-defined probability distribution on the recruitment-induced subgraph of respondents. The author shows that this distribution can be interpreted as an exponential random graph model and develops a computationally efficient method for estimating the hidden graph. The author validates the method using simulated data and applies the technique to an RDS study of injection drug users in St. Petersburg, Russia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hidden population; link tracing; missing data; network inference; respondent-driven sampling; social network

Year:  2016        PMID: 31607761      PMCID: PMC6788810          DOI: 10.1177/0081175016641713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Methodol        ISSN: 0081-1750


  31 in total

1.  Assessing respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  Sharad Goel; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  MODELING SOCIAL NETWORKS FROM SAMPLED DATA.

Authors:  Mark S Handcock; Krista J Gile
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Evaluation of respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  Nicky McCreesh; Simon D W Frost; Janet Seeley; Joseph Katongole; Matilda N Tarsh; Richard Ndunguse; Fatima Jichi; Natasha L Lunel; Dermot Maher; Lisa G Johnston; Pam Sonnenberg; Andrew J Copas; Richard J Hayes; Richard G White
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Sexual transmissibility of HIV among opiate users with concurrent sexual partnerships: an egocentric network study in Yunnan, China.

Authors:  Jian Li; Hongjie Liu; Jianhua Li; Jian Luo; Nana Koram; Roger Detels
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.526

5.  AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING: POINT ESTIMATES, VARIANCE, DEGREE MEASURES, AND OUT-OF-EQUILIBRIUM DATA.

Authors:  Cyprian Wejnert
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2009-08-01

6.  Harnessing peer networks as an instrument for AIDS prevention: results from a peer-driven intervention.

Authors:  R S Broadhead; D D Heckathorn; D L Weakliem; D L Anthony; H Madray; R J Mills; J Hughes
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Respondent-Driven Sampling: An Assessment of Current Methodology.

Authors:  Krista J Gile; Mark S Handcock
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2010-08

8.  Estimation of the number of injection drug users in St. Petersburg, Russia.

Authors:  Robert Heimer; Edward White
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 4.492

9.  Respondent driven sampling--where we are and where should we be going?

Authors:  Richard G White; Amy Lansky; Sharad Goel; David Wilson; Wolfgang Hladik; Avi Hakim; Simon D W Frost
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.519

10.  Comparison of contact patterns relevant for transmission of respiratory pathogens in Thailand and The Netherlands using respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  Mart L Stein; Jim E van Steenbergen; Vincent Buskens; Peter G M van der Heijden; Charnchudhi Chanyasanha; Mathuros Tipayamongkholgul; Anna E Thorson; Linus Bengtsson; Xin Lu; Mirjam E E Kretzschmar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Consistency for the tree bootstrap in respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  A K B Green; T H McCormick; A E Raftery
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  HIV Risk, Prevalence, and Access to Care Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Lebanon.

Authors:  Robert Heimer; Russell Barbour; Danielle Khouri; Forrest W Crawford; Fatma Shebl; Elie Aaraj; Kaveh Khoshnood
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.205

3.  Network centrality for the identification of biomarkers in respondent-driven sampling datasets.

Authors:  Jacob Grubb; Derek Lopez; Bhuvaneshwar Mohan; John Matta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.