Literature DB >> 23729943

How many people do you know?: Efficiently estimating personal network size.

Tyler H McCormick1, Matthew J Salganik, Tian Zheng.   

Abstract

In this paper we develop a method to estimate both individual social network size (i.e., degree) and the distribution of network sizes in a population by asking respondents how many people they know in specific subpopulations (e.g., people named Michael). Building on the scale-up method of Killworth et al. (1998b) and other previous attempts to estimate individual network size, we propose a latent non-random mixing model which resolves three known problems with previous approaches. As a byproduct, our method also provides estimates of the rate of social mixing between population groups. We demonstrate the model using a sample of 1,370 adults originally collected by McCarty et al. (2001). Based on insights developed during the statistical modeling, we conclude by offering practical guidelines for the design of future surveys to estimate social network size. Most importantly, we show that if the first names to be asked about are chosen properly, the simple scale-up degree estimates can enjoy the same bias-reduction as that from the our more complex latent non-random mixing model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Latent Non-random Mixing Model; Negative Binomial Distribution; Personal Network Size; Social Networks; Survey Design

Year:  2010        PMID: 23729943      PMCID: PMC3666355          DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  8 in total

1.  Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks.

Authors:  R Pastor-Satorras; A Vespignani
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2001-04-02       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Empirical analysis of an evolving social network.

Authors:  Gueorgi Kossinets; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks.

Authors:  J-P Onnela; J Saramäki; J Hyvönen; G Szabó; D Lazer; K Kaski; J Kertész; A-L Barabási
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations.

Authors:  F C Santos; J M Pacheco; Tom Lenaerts
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Degree distributions in sexual networks: a framework for evaluating evidence.

Authors:  Deven T Hamilton; Mark S Handcock; Martina Morris
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Social network size in humans.

Authors:  R A Hill; R I M Dunbar
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2003-03

7.  Estimation of seroprevalence, rape, and homelessness in the United States using a social network approach.

Authors:  P D Killworth; C McCarty; H R Bernard; G A Shelley; E C Johnsen
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  1998-04

8.  Identity and search in social networks.

Authors:  Duncan J Watts; Peter Sheridan Dodds; M E J Newman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-05-17       Impact factor: 47.728

  8 in total
  27 in total

1.  Assessing respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  Sharad Goel; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The efficacy of respondent-driven sampling for the health assessment of minority populations.

Authors:  Grazyna Badowski; Lilnabeth P Somera; Brayan Simsiman; Hye-Ryeon Lee; Kevin Cassel; Alisha Yamanaka; JunHao Ren
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Estimating the Size of the Methamphetamine-Using Population in New York City Using Network Sampling Techniques.

Authors:  Kirk Dombrowski; Bilal Khan; Travis Wendel; Katherine McLean; Evan Misshula; Ric Curtis
Journal:  Adv Appl Sociol       Date:  2012-12-01

4.  Evaluating the Paper-to-Screen Translation of Participant-Aided Sociograms with High-Risk Participants.

Authors:  Bernie Hogan; Joshua R Melville; Gregory Lee Philips; Patrick Janulis; Noshir Contractor; Brian S Mustanski; Michelle Birkett
Journal:  Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst       Date:  2016-05

5.  Evaluating Sampling Biases from Third-party Reporting as a Method for Improving Survey Measures of Sensitive Behaviors.

Authors:  Stéphane Helleringer; Jimi Adams; Sara Yeatman; James Mkandawire
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2019-07-29

6.  The Game of Contacts: Estimating the Social Visibility of Groups.

Authors:  Matthew J Salganik; Maeve B Mello; Alexandre H Abdo; Neilane Bertoni; Dimitri Fazito; Francisco I Bastos
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2011-01-01

7.  Evaluation of respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  Nicky McCreesh; Simon D W Frost; Janet Seeley; Joseph Katongole; Matilda N Tarsh; Richard Ndunguse; Fatima Jichi; Natasha L Lunel; Dermot Maher; Lisa G Johnston; Pam Sonnenberg; Andrew J Copas; Richard J Hayes; Richard G White
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Generalizing the Network Scale-Up Method: A New Estimator for the Size of Hidden Populations.

Authors:  Dennis M Feehan; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2016-09-20

9.  Estimating the Size of Hidden Populations Using Respondent-driven Sampling Data: Case Examples from Morocco.

Authors:  Lisa G Johnston; Katherine R McLaughlin; Houssine El Rhilani; Amina Latifi; Abdalla Toufik; Aziza Bennani; Kamal Alami; Boutaina Elomari; Mark S Handcock
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  The Analysis of Duocentric Social Networks: A Primer.

Authors:  David P Kennedy; Grace L Jackson; Harold D Green; Thomas N Bradbury; Benjamin R Karney
Journal:  J Marriage Fam       Date:  2015-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.