Literature DB >> 26189988

Social network size in humans.

R A Hill1, R I M Dunbar2.   

Abstract

This paper examines social network size in contemporary Western society based on the exchange of Christmas cards. Maximum network size averaged 153.5 individuals, with a mean network size of 124.9 for those individuals explicitly contacted; these values are remarkably close to the group size of 150 predicted for humans on the basis of the size of their neocortex. Age, household type, and the relationship to the individual influence network structure, although the proportion of kin remained relatively constant at around 21%. Frequency of contact between network members was primarily determined by two classes of variable: passive factors (distance, work colleague, overseas) and active factors (emotional closeness, genetic relatedness). Controlling for the influence of passive factors on contact rates allowed the hierarchical structure of human social groups to be delimited. These findings suggest that there may be cognitive constraints on network size.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frequency of contact; Group size; Humans; Neocortex size; Social networks

Year:  2003        PMID: 26189988     DOI: 10.1007/s12110-003-1016-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  3 in total

1.  Social networks, support cliques, and kinship.

Authors:  R I Dunbar; M Spoors
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1995-09

2.  Social network development and functioning during a life transition.

Authors:  R B Hays; D Oxley
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1986-02

3.  Estimation of seroprevalence, rape, and homelessness in the United States using a social network approach.

Authors:  P D Killworth; C McCarty; H R Bernard; G A Shelley; E C Johnsen
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  1998-04
  3 in total
  95 in total

1.  Orbital prefrontal cortex volume predicts social network size: an imaging study of individual differences in humans.

Authors:  Joanne Powell; Penelope A Lewis; Neil Roberts; Marta García-Fiñana; R I M Dunbar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  The culture ready brain.

Authors:  Charles Whitehead
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  The amygdala as a hub in brain networks that support social life.

Authors:  Kevin C Bickart; Bradford C Dickerson; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Sex differences in the association between social relationships and insomnia symptoms.

Authors:  Kyungmee Park; Daol Cho; Eun Lee; Junsol Kim; Jee-Seon Shim; Yoosik Youm; Suk Kyoon An; Kee Namkoong; Hyeon Chang Kim
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-11-15       Impact factor: 4.062

5.  The social network and alcohol use.

Authors:  Gregory G Homish; Kenneth E Leonard
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.582

6.  Do birds of a feather flock together? The relationship between similarity and altruism in social networks.

Authors:  Oliver Curry; Robin I M Dunbar
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2013-09

7.  Clique size and network characteristics in hyperlink cinema. Constraints of evolved psychology.

Authors:  Jaimie Arona Krems; R I M Dunbar
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2013-12

8.  Focused grooming networks and stress alleviation in wild female baboons.

Authors:  Roman M Wittig; Catherine Crockford; Julia Lehmann; Patricia L Whitten; Robert M Seyfarth; Dorothy L Cheney
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 3.587

9.  Responses to social and environmental stress are attenuated by strong male bonds in wild macaques.

Authors:  Christopher Young; Bonaventura Majolo; Michael Heistermann; Oliver Schülke; Julia Ostner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  The benefits of social capital: close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival.

Authors:  Joan B Silk; Jacinta C Beehner; Thore J Bergman; Catherine Crockford; Anne L Engh; Liza R Moscovice; Roman M Wittig; Robert M Seyfarth; Dorothy L Cheney
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.