Literature DB >> 26949438

Estimating Population Size Using the Network Scale Up Method.

Rachael Maltiel1, Adrian E Raftery2, Tyler H McCormick2, Aaron J Baraff2.   

Abstract

We develop methods for estimating the size of hard-to-reach populations from data collected using network-based questions on standard surveys. Such data arise by asking respondents how many people they know in a specific group (e.g. people named Michael, intravenous drug users). The Network Scale up Method (NSUM) is a tool for producing population size estimates using these indirect measures of respondents' networks. Killworth et al. (1998a,b) proposed maximum likelihood estimators of population size for a fixed effects model in which respondents' degrees or personal network sizes are treated as fixed. We extend this by treating personal network sizes as random effects, yielding principled statements of uncertainty. This allows us to generalize the model to account for variation in people's propensity to know people in particular subgroups (barrier effects), such as their tendency to know people like themselves, as well as their lack of awareness of or reluctance to acknowledge their contacts' group memberships (transmission bias). NSUM estimates also suffer from recall bias, in which respondents tend to underestimate the number of members of larger groups that they know, and conversely for smaller groups. We propose a data-driven adjustment method to deal with this. Our methods perform well in simulation studies, generating improved estimates and calibrated uncertainty intervals, as well as in back estimates of real sample data. We apply them to data from a study of HIV/AIDS prevalence in Curitiba, Brazil. Our results show that when transmission bias is present, external information about its likely extent can greatly improve the estimates. The methods are implemented in the NSUM R package.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aggregated relational data; Barrier effect; HIV/AIDS; Recall bias; Social network; Transmission bias

Year:  2015        PMID: 26949438      PMCID: PMC4777323          DOI: 10.1214/15-AOAS827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Appl Stat        ISSN: 1932-6157            Impact factor:   2.083


  5 in total

1.  Estimation of seroprevalence, rape, and homelessness in the United States using a social network approach.

Authors:  P D Killworth; C McCarty; H R Bernard; G A Shelley; E C Johnsen
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  1998-04

2.  The Game of Contacts: Estimating the Social Visibility of Groups.

Authors:  Matthew J Salganik; Maeve B Mello; Alexandre H Abdo; Neilane Bertoni; Dimitri Fazito; Francisco I Bastos
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2011-01-01

3.  How many people do you know?: Efficiently estimating personal network size.

Authors:  Tyler H McCormick; Matthew J Salganik; Tian Zheng
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Assessing network scale-up estimates for groups most at risk of HIV/AIDS: evidence from a multiple-method study of heavy drug users in Curitiba, Brazil.

Authors:  Matthew J Salganik; Dimitri Fazito; Neilane Bertoni; Alexandre H Abdo; Maeve B Mello; Francisco I Bastos
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Population size estimation of men who have sex with men through the network scale-up method in Japan.

Authors:  Satoshi Ezoe; Takeo Morooka; Tatsuya Noda; Miriam Lewis Sabin; Soichi Koike
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total
  10 in total

1.  Evidence for an increase in cannabis use in Iran - A systematic review and trend analysis.

Authors:  Yasna Rostam-Abadi; Jaleh Gholami; Masoumeh Amin-Esmaeili; Shahab Baheshmat; Marziyeh Hamzehzadeh; Hossein Rafiemanesh; Morteza Nasserbakht; Leila Ghalichi; Anousheh Safarcherati; Farhad Taremian; Ramin Mojtabai; Afarin Rahimi-Movaghar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Generalizing the Network Scale-Up Method: A New Estimator for the Size of Hidden Populations.

Authors:  Dennis M Feehan; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2016-09-20

3.  Quantity Versus Quality: A Survey Experiment to Improve the Network Scale-up Method.

Authors:  Dennis M Feehan; Aline Umubyeyi; Mary Mahy; Wolfgang Hladik; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Population size estimation of female sex workers in Iran: Synthesis of methods and results.

Authors:  Hamid Sharifi; Mohammad Karamouzian; Mohammad Reza Baneshi; Mostafa Shokoohi; AliAkbar Haghdoost; Willi McFarland; Ali Mirzazadeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Constructing a Watts-Strogatz network from a small-world network with symmetric degree distribution.

Authors:  Mozart B C Menezes; Seokjin Kim; Rongbing Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  A review of methods to estimate the visibility factor for bias correction in network scale-up studies.

Authors:  Aliakbar Haghdoost; Milad Ahmadi Gohari; Ali Mirzazadeh; Farzaneh Zolala; Mohammad Reza Baneshi
Journal:  Epidemiol Health       Date:  2018-08-16

7.  Estimating Hidden Population Sizes with Venue-based Sampling: Extensions of the Generalized Network Scale-up Estimator.

Authors:  Ashton M Verdery; Sharon Weir; Zahra Reynolds; Grace Mulholland; Jessie K Edwards
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Methodological considerations in using the Network Scale Up (NSU) for the estimation of risky behaviors of particular age-gender groups: An example in the case of intentional abortion.

Authors:  Maryam Zamanian; Farzaneh Zolala; Ali Akbar Haghdoost; Saeide Haji-Maghsoudi; Zeynab Heydari; Mohammad Reza Baneshi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An Assessment of Third-Party Reporting of Close Ties to Measure Sensitive Behaviors: The Confidante Method to Measure Abortion Incidence in Ethiopia and Uganda.

Authors:  Margaret Giorgio; Elizabeth Sully; Doris W Chiu
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2021-11-11

10.  Deriving and interpreting population size estimates for adolescent and young key populations at higher risk of HIV transmission: Men who have sex with men and females who sell sex.

Authors:  Lisa Grazina Johnston; Van Kinh Nguyen; Sudha Balakrishnan; Chibwe Lwamba; Aleya Khalifa; Keith Sabin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.