Literature DB >> 29375167

Generalizing the Network Scale-Up Method: A New Estimator for the Size of Hidden Populations.

Dennis M Feehan1, Matthew J Salganik2,3.   

Abstract

The network scale-up method enables researchers to estimate the size of hidden populations, such as drug injectors and sex workers, using sampled social network data. The basic scale-up estimator offers advantages over other size estimation techniques, but it depends on problematic modeling assumptions. We propose a new generalized scale-up estimator that can be used in settings with non-random social mixing and imperfect awareness about membership in the hidden population. Further, the new estimator can be used when data are collected via complex sample designs and from incomplete sampling frames. However, the generalized scale-up estimator also requires data from two samples: one from the frame population and one from the hidden population. In some situations these data from the hidden population can be collected by adding a small number of questions to already planned studies. For other situations, we develop interpretable adjustment factors that can be applied to the basic scale-up estimator. We conclude with practical recommendations for the design and analysis of future studies.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 29375167      PMCID: PMC5783650          DOI: 10.1177/0081175016665425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Methodol        ISSN: 0081-1750


  39 in total

1.  Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks.

Authors:  Sharad Goel; Winter Mason; Duncan J Watts
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2010-10

2.  Modeling and analyzing respondent-driven sampling as a counting process.

Authors:  Yakir Berchenko; Jonathan D Rosenblatt; Simon D W Frost
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Variance estimation, design effects, and sample size calculations for respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.671

4.  Evaluation of respondent-driven sampling.

Authors:  Nicky McCreesh; Simon D W Frost; Janet Seeley; Joseph Katongole; Matilda N Tarsh; Richard Ndunguse; Fatima Jichi; Natasha L Lunel; Dermot Maher; Lisa G Johnston; Pam Sonnenberg; Andrew J Copas; Richard J Hayes; Richard G White
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Estimating hidden population size using Respondent-Driven Sampling data.

Authors:  Mark S Handcock; Krista J Gile; Corinne M Mar
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.125

6.  Estimating the Size of Hidden Populations Using Respondent-driven Sampling Data: Case Examples from Morocco.

Authors:  Lisa G Johnston; Katherine R McLaughlin; Houssine El Rhilani; Amina Latifi; Abdalla Toufik; Aziza Bennani; Kamal Alami; Boutaina Elomari; Mark S Handcock
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Respondent-driven sampling as Markov chain Monte Carlo.

Authors:  Sharad Goel; Matthew J Salganik
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 8.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for respondent-driven sampling studies: "STROBE-RDS" statement.

Authors:  Richard G White; Avi J Hakim; Matthew J Salganik; Michael W Spiller; Lisa G Johnston; Ligia Kerr; Carl Kendall; Amy Drake; David Wilson; Kate Orroth; Matthias Egger; Wolfgang Hladik
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Estimating the sizes of populations at high risk for HIV: a comparison study.

Authors:  Liwei Jing; Chengyi Qu; Hongmei Yu; Tong Wang; Yuehua Cui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Estimating the size of HIV key affected populations in Chongqing, China, using the network scale-up method.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Shuilian Bao; Wen Lin; Guohui Wu; Wei Zhang; Wolfgang Hladik; Abu Abdul-Quader; Marc Bulterys; Serena Fuller; Lu Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  The unknown denominator problem in population studies of disease frequency.

Authors:  Christopher N Morrison; Andrew G Rundle; Charles C Branas; Stanford Chihuri; Christina Mehranbod; Guohua Li
Journal:  Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol       Date:  2020-07-18

2.  THE GRAPHICAL STRUCTURE OF RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING.

Authors:  Forrest W Crawford
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2016-08-01

3.  What is the prevalence of and trend in opioid use disorder in the United States from 2010 to 2019? Using multiplier approaches to estimate prevalence for an unknown population size.

Authors:  Katherine M Keyes; Caroline Rutherford; Ava Hamilton; Joshua A Barocas; Kitty H Gelberg; Peter P Mueller; Daniel J Feaster; Nabila El-Bassel; Magdalena Cerdá
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend Rep       Date:  2022-04-08

4.  Estimating Contextual Effects from Ego Network Data.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Smith; G Robin Gauthier
Journal:  Sociol Methodol       Date:  2020-06-02

5.  Hepatitis C Care Cascades for 3 Populations at High Risk: Low-income Trans Women, Young People Who Inject Drugs, and Men Who Have Sex With Men and Inject Drugs.

Authors:  Shelley N Facente; Sheena Patel; Jennifer Hecht; Erin Wilson; Willi McFarland; Kimberly Page; Peter Vickerman; Hannah Fraser; Katie Burk; Meghan D Morris
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  An indirect estimation of the population size of students with high-risk behaviors in select universities of medical sciences: A network scale-up study.

Authors:  Homeira Sajjadi; Zahra Jorjoran Shushtari; Mohsen Shati; Yahya Salimi; Masoomeh Dejman; Meroe Vameghi; Salahedin Karimi; Zohreh Mahmoodi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Estimating Hidden Population Sizes with Venue-based Sampling: Extensions of the Generalized Network Scale-up Estimator.

Authors:  Ashton M Verdery; Sharon Weir; Zahra Reynolds; Grace Mulholland; Jessie K Edwards
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Methodological considerations in using the Network Scale Up (NSU) for the estimation of risky behaviors of particular age-gender groups: An example in the case of intentional abortion.

Authors:  Maryam Zamanian; Farzaneh Zolala; Ali Akbar Haghdoost; Saeide Haji-Maghsoudi; Zeynab Heydari; Mohammad Reza Baneshi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Estimating the size of key populations for HIV in Singapore using the network scale-up method.

Authors:  Alvin Kuo Jing Teo; Kiesha Prem; Mark I C Chen; Adrian Roellin; Mee Lian Wong; Hanh Hao La; Alex R Cook
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 3.519

10.  Tracking the reach of COVID-19 kin loss with a bereavement multiplier applied to the United States.

Authors:  Ashton M Verdery; Emily Smith-Greenaway; Rachel Margolis; Jonathan Daw
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.