Literature DB >> 10097624

The problem of measuring change in individual health-related quality of life by postal questionnaire: use of the patient-generated index in a disabled population.

C Macduff1, E Russell.   

Abstract

The Patient-generated Index (PGI) is a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure which asks respondents to nominate the areas of their lives which are most affected by their health condition, so that they can then rate the severity of the effects and weight their relative importance. It is unusual amongst such measures in that it is designed for postal administration. This study assessed the ability of the revised PGI to measure change in HRQoL in a population of 161 people who had previously been identified as having limiting long-term illness. A questionnaire, including a revised version of the PGI and the developmental version of the SF-36, was mailed at two time points (T1 and T2), 4.5 months apart. The PGI was subsequently assessed in terms of practicality, validity, reliability and responsiveness. At T1, 62% of those who felt that they still had a health problem affecting their life completed the PGI correctly. These people were significantly younger and had spent longer in education than the remaining 38%. Only 19 respondents completed the PGI correctly on both occasions, rendering reliability and responsiveness testing inconclusive. The value of the PGI is significantly diminished by the fact that many people cannot complete it correctly. Future development of the instrument is appraised in the context of related measurement methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10097624     DOI: 10.1023/a:1008831209706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  12 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life: a dynamic construct.

Authors:  P J Allison; D Locker; J S Feine
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  The problem of quality of life.

Authors:  S M Hunt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Evaluating the efficacy of medical treatment: possibilities and limitations.

Authors:  C Jenkinson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Quality of life in cancer patients--an hypothesis.

Authors:  K C Calman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Measurement of quality of life in atopic dermatitis: correlation and validation of two different methods.

Authors:  R M Herd; M J Tidman; D A Ruta; J A Hunter
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 9.302

6.  A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS.

Authors:  A M Hickey; G Bury; C A O'Boyle; F Bradley; F D O'Kelly; W Shannon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-06

7.  Interpreting self reported limiting long term illness.

Authors:  G Cohen; J Forbes; M Garraway
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-16

8.  Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement.

Authors:  C A O'Boyle; H McGee; A Hickey; K O'Malley; C R Joyce
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-05-02       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  What things are important in people's lives? A survey of the public's judgements to inform scales of health related quality of life.

Authors:  A Bowling
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey.

Authors:  C Paterson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-04-20
View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Are quality of life measures patient centred?

Authors:  A J Carr; I J Higginson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-02

2.  Using the Patient Generated Index to evaluate response shift post-stroke.

Authors:  Sara Ahmed; Nancy E Mayo; Sharon Wood-Dauphinee; James A Hanley; S Robin Cohen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Assessment of quality of life in later life: development and validation of the QuiLL.

Authors:  Sherrill Evans; Claire Gately; Peter Huxley; Alyson Smith; Sube Banerjee
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  In support of an individualized approach to assessing quality of life: comparison between Patient Generated Index and standardized measures across four health conditions.

Authors:  Nancy E Mayo; Ala' Aburub; Marie-Josée Brouillette; Ayse Kuspinar; Carolina Moriello; Ana Maria Rodriguez; Susan Scott
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Twelve years' experience with the Patient Generated Index (PGI) of quality of life: a graded structured review.

Authors:  Faith Martin; Laura Camfield; Karen Rodham; Petra Kliempt; Danny Ruta
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Individualized measurement of quality of life in older adults: development and pilot testing of a new tool.

Authors:  Martin Holzhausen; Adelheid Kuhlmey; Peter Martus
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2010-08-27

7.  Patient understanding of two commonly used patient reported outcome measures for primary care: a cognitive interview study.

Authors:  Mairead Murphy; Sandra Hollinghurst; Chris Salisbury
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Identification, description and appraisal of generic PROMs for primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mairead Murphy; Sandra Hollinghurst; Chris Salisbury
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.497

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.