Literature DB >> 9225410

Quality of life: a dynamic construct.

P J Allison1, D Locker, J S Feine.   

Abstract

The principle of Einstein's theory of special relativity is that an observer of an apparently moving body cannot be sure if the body really has moved, if he/she has moved or if both events have occurred. Although Einstein was discussing physical events, a similar hypothesis may apply to quality of life. When using quality of life instruments, one presumes that the point of reference (the observer in Einstein's terms) does not move, i.e. that an individual's attitude towards a particular construct will remain stable. Otherwise, changes in response to particular variables cannot be interpreted. However, attitudes are not constant: they vary with time and experience and are modified by such psychological phenomena as adaptation, coping, expectancy, optimism, self-control and self-concept. For example, eating problems may be extremely important at one point in a person's life. However, when oral discomfort has been diagnosed as cancer and treated with surgery or radiation, the same individual may "objectively" demonstrate more problems when eating, but report them as less because they have now become relatively unimportant. Furthermore, paradoxical reports that some groups of ill individuals rate their quality of life higher than do "healthy" persons raise similar questions concerning between-group point of reference differences. Investigators in the fields of organisational management, education and psychology have developed techniques such as "then ratings", saliency indicators and individualised questionnaires in attempts to quantify within-subject variability and between-group differences pertaining to point of reference. We suggest that similar methods may help us to measure change in the impact of the different items of quality of life instruments. In this paper, we will describe the theories of change associated with quality of life measurement. In addition, we will present evidence suggesting that the point of reference does change, the reasons for this and possible solutions to the problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9225410     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00339-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  67 in total

Review 1.  Quality of life and neurological illness: a review of the literature.

Authors:  R Murrell
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  Measuring quality of life: Is quality of life determined by expectations or experience?

Authors:  A J Carr; B Gibson; P G Robinson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-19

3.  Appropriate time frames for data collection in quality of life research among cancer patients at the end of life.

Authors:  Siew Tzuh Tang; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Hi! How are you? Response shift, implicit theories and differing epistemologies.

Authors:  Geoffrey Norman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Measurement properties of a new quality of life measure for patients with work disability associated with musculoskeletal pain.

Authors:  M F Coutu; M J Durand; P Loisel; G Dupuis; S Gervais
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

6.  Change in quality of life of people with stroke over time: true change or response shift?

Authors:  Sara Ahmed; Nancy E Mayo; Marc Corbiere; Sharon Wood-Dauphinee; James Hanley; Robin Cohen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Test--retest reliability of Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-49) in adults with systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Hon K Yuen; Sybil L Nelson
Journal:  Spec Care Dentist       Date:  2013-06-19

Review 8.  Thirty years of portraying oral health through models: what have we accomplished in oral health-related quality of life research?

Authors:  Mario A Brondani; Michael I MacEntee
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Assessment of Oral Health Related Quality of Life Among Completely Edentulous Patients in Western India by Using GOHAI.

Authors:  Rajani A Dable; Girish S Nazirkar; Shailendra B Singh; Pradnya B Wasnik
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-08-07

10.  Predictors of Quality of Life in Montreal, Canada: A Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Jean Caron; Margaret Cargo; Mark Daniel; Aihua Liu
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  2018-10-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.