Literature DB >> 8560307

Evaluating the efficacy of medical treatment: possibilities and limitations.

C Jenkinson1.   

Abstract

This review outlines the possible uses of subjective health status measures in the evaluation of medical treatment, and possible limitations and pitfalls that potential users of such measures must be aware. Whilst much has been written about the requirements of measures in terms of reliability, validity and responsiveness, many existing measures which have gained widespread use have serious shortcomings. In this paper, the limitations of some existing questionnaires are outlined. It is argued that whilst outcomes measurement has the promise to positively influence medical care, done without due consideration of its limitations and weaknesses it could lead to inaccurate or inappropriate data. In the current climate, in which health outcomes data is viewed as central to monitoring and evaluation, inappropriate or unconsidered use of measures could have drastic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8560307     DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00119-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  17 in total

Review 1.  Subjective outcome measurement--a primer.

Authors:  M P Tully; J A Cantrill
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-06

2.  A comparison of responsiveness indices in multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  L E Pfennings; H M van der Ploeg; L Cohen; C H Polman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Quality of life and neurological illness: a review of the literature.

Authors:  R Murrell
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; S Stewart-Brown; S Petersen; C Paice
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  The SF36 Version 2: critical analyses of population weights, scoring algorithms and population norms.

Authors:  Graeme Hawthorne; Richard H Osborne; Anne Taylor; Jan Sansoni
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Making sense of ambiguity: evaluation in internal reliability and face validity of the SF 36 questionnaire in women presenting with menorrhagia.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; V Peto; A Coulter
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-03

7.  The problem of measuring change in individual health-related quality of life by postal questionnaire: use of the patient-generated index in a disabled population.

Authors:  C Macduff; E Russell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Validation of the modified Vesikari score in children with gastroenteritis in 5 US emergency departments.

Authors:  David Schnadower; Phillip I Tarr; Marc H Gorelick; Karen O'Connell; Cindy G Roskind; Elizabeth C Powell; Jayashree Rao; Seema Bhatt; Stephen B Freedman
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.839

9.  Translation, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Falls Risk Awareness Questionnaire (FRAQ): FRAQ-Brazil.

Authors:  Anália R Lopes; Celita S Trelha
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  The Short-Form 36 and older people: some problems encountered when using postal administration.

Authors:  S Mallinson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.