Literature DB >> 17268928

Twelve years' experience with the Patient Generated Index (PGI) of quality of life: a graded structured review.

Faith Martin1, Laura Camfield, Karen Rodham, Petra Kliempt, Danny Ruta.   

Abstract

The Patient Generated Index (PGI) is an individualised quality of life (QoL) measure that has been in use since 1994. Various adaptations have been made to suit a variety of client groups. The PGI's psychometric properties have been studied but their review is necessary to inform instrument choice. This article provides a structured review, using grading criteria adapted from those developed to aid outcome measure selection for use with older people. These criteria grade quality of evidence and strength of findings for psychometric validity, providing a useful model for future reviews. All published articles providing data addressing validity, reliability and/or responsiveness were included in the review. Eighteen relevant articles were identified and analysed using the grading criteria. Variable results and quality of investigation were seen. Generally the measure was found to be adequately reliable for group comparisons. The PGI appeared valid but evidence for responsiveness was unclear. Those versions of the measure using fewer points in their Likert scales may have higher reliability. Cognitions involved in QoL judgements remain little understood and investigations of psychometric properties may be enhanced by examination of appraisal processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17268928     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-006-9152-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  34 in total

1.  Using the Patient Generated Index to evaluate response shift post-stroke.

Authors:  Sara Ahmed; Nancy E Mayo; Sharon Wood-Dauphinee; James A Hanley; S Robin Cohen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Development of a client-generated health outcome measure for community nursing.

Authors:  R Griffiths; R Jayasuriya; H Maitland
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.939

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Impact on quality of life assessed by traditional standard-item and individualized patient preference health status questionnaires.

Authors:  P Tugwell; C Bombardier; W W Buchanan; C Goldsmith; E Grace; K J Bennett; H J Williams; M Egger; G S Alarcon; M Guttadauria
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-01

5.  The problem of measuring change in individual health-related quality of life by postal questionnaire: use of the patient-generated index in a disabled population.

Authors:  C Macduff; E Russell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  The validity of the modified patient generated index--a quantitative and qualitative approach.

Authors:  M P Tully; J A Cantrill
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Patient generated index: new instrument for measuring quality of life in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  John Camilleri-Brennan; Danny A Ruta; Robert J C Steele
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Postnatal quality of life: a pilot study using the Mother-Generated Index.

Authors:  Andrew Symon; Anna MacKay; Danny Ruta
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.187

9.  Head and neck cancer: to what extent can psychological factors explain differences between health-related quality of life and individual quality of life?

Authors:  C D Llewellyn; M McGurk; J Weinman
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 1.651

10.  Reconsidering the psychometrics of quality of life assessment in light of response shift and appraisal.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Bruce D Rapkin
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2004-03-23       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  The use, feasibility and psychometric properties of an individualised quality-of-life instrument: a systematic review of the SEIQoL-DW.

Authors:  L Wettergren; A Kettis-Lindblad; M Sprangers; L Ring
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Evaluation of the stages of completion and scoring of the Patient Generated Index (PGI) in patients with rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Andrew M Garratt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  In support of an individualized approach to assessing quality of life: comparison between Patient Generated Index and standardized measures across four health conditions.

Authors:  Nancy E Mayo; Ala' Aburub; Marie-Josée Brouillette; Ayse Kuspinar; Carolina Moriello; Ana Maria Rodriguez; Susan Scott
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-12-17       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Impact of reconceptualization response shift on rating of quality of life over time among people with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Ala' S Aburub; B Gagnon; S Ahmed; A M Rodríguez; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  A review of the application, feasibility, and the psychometric properties of the individualized measures in cancer.

Authors:  Ala' S Aburub; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Responsiveness of SF-36 Health Survey and Patient Generated Index in people with chronic knee pain commenced on oral analgesia: analysis of data from a randomised controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Alex Papou; Salma Hussain; Daniel McWilliams; Weiya Zhang; Michael Doherty
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Use of the Patient-generated Index in systemic sclerosis to assess patient-centered outcomes.

Authors:  Sofia de Achaval; Michael A Kallen; Maureen D Mayes; Maria A Lopez-Olivo; Maria E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  Agreement between personally generated areas of quality of life concern and standard outcome measures in people with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Ala' S Aburub; B Gagnon; A M Rodríguez; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Pitfalls in the interpretation of standardised quality of life instruments for individual patients? A qualitative study in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Timothy R Wilson; Yvonne Birks; David J Alexander
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Do Generic Preference-Based Measures Accurately Capture Areas of Health-Related Quality of Life Important to Individuals with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Content Validation Study.

Authors:  Nicole Peters; Vanina Dal Bello-Haas; Tara Packham; Marvin Chum; Colleen O'Connell; Wendy S Johnston; Joy C MacDermid; John Turnbull; Jill Van Damme; Ayse Kuspinar
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2021-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.