Literature DB >> 10081157

Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance.

J R Tresilian1, M Mon-Williams, B M Kelly.   

Abstract

Multiple cues contribute to the visual perception of an object's distance from the observer. The manner in which the nervous system combines these various cues is of considerable interest. Although it is accepted that image cues play a significant role in distance perception, controversy exists regarding the use of kinaesthetic information about the eyes' state of convergence. We used a perturbation technique to explore the contribution of vergence to visually based distance estimates as a function of both fixation distance and the availability of retinal information. Our results show that the nervous system increases the weighting given to vergence as (i) fixation distance becomes closer; and (ii) the available retinal image cues decrease. We also identified the presence of a strong contraction bias when distance cues were studied in isolation, but we argue that such biases do not suggest that vergence provides an ineffectual signal for near-space perception.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10081157      PMCID: PMC1689642          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  11 in total

1.  Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis.

Authors:  E B Johnston
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The necessity of a perception-action approach to definite distance perception: monocular distance perception to guide reaching.

Authors:  G P Bingham; C C Pagano
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Scalar perceptions with binocular cues of distance.

Authors:  W C Gogel
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1972-12

4.  Ambiguity in perception and experimentation.

Authors:  D W Massaro
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-12

5.  Disparity scaling and the perception of frontoparallel surfaces.

Authors:  B J Rogers; M F Bradshaw
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues.

Authors:  M J Young; M S Landy; L T Maloney
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion.

Authors:  M S Landy; L T Maloney; E B Johnston; M Young
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading.

Authors:  S Grossberg; E Mingolla
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Visually perceiving distance: a comment on Shebilske, Karmiohl, and Proffitt (1983).

Authors:  M T Turvey; J Solomon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Binocular distance perception.

Authors:  J M Foley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  20 in total

1.  Geometric computations underlying eye-hand coordination: orientations of the two eyes and the head.

Authors:  D Y P Henriques; W P Medendorp; C C A M Gielen; J D Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  How perceived egocentric distance varies with changes in tonic vergence.

Authors:  Anne-Emmanuelle Priot; Pascaline Neveu; Olivier Sillan; Justin Plantier; Corinne Roumes; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Visual control of action in step descent.

Authors:  Dorothy Cowie; Oliver Braddick; Janette Atkinson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Adaptation of egocentric distance perception under telestereoscopic viewing within reaching space.

Authors:  Anne-Emmanuelle Priot; Rafael Laboissière; Olivier Sillan; Corinne Roumes; Claude Prablanc
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Grasping trajectories in a virtual environment adhere to Weber's law.

Authors:  Aviad Ozana; Sigal Berman; Tzvi Ganel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Temporal integration limits of stereovision in reaching and grasping.

Authors:  K R Wilson; P M Pearson; H E Matheson; J J Marotta
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Dissociation between vergence and binocular disparity cues in the control of prehension.

Authors:  Dean R Melmoth; Mithu Storoni; Georgina Todd; Alison L Finlay; Simon Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  The binocular advantage in visuomotor tasks involving tools.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Shah Farzana Begum; Alice McDonald; Jack Trowbridge
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-03-20

10.  Depth discrimination of constant angular size stimuli in action space: role of accommodation and convergence cues.

Authors:  Abdeldjallil Naceri; Alessandro Moscatelli; Ryad Chellali
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.