Literature DB >> 18493755

Temporal integration limits of stereovision in reaching and grasping.

K R Wilson1, P M Pearson, H E Matheson, J J Marotta.   

Abstract

Even though there have been extensive investigations of the temporal integration limits of binocular vision in perceptual tasks, relatively little is known about temporal integration limits during the completion of visuomotor tasks. To assess the temporal integration limits of binocular disparity within the action domain, accuracy of reach kinematics in a reaching and grasping task under continuous binocular and monocular viewing conditions were compared with those obtained under alternating monocular viewing conditions with interocular delays ranging from 14 to 58 ms. Even the shortest of the interocular delays resulted in larger grip apertures than those in the continuous monocular and binocular viewing conditions. The short temporal integration interval of stereovision obtained in this study cannot be accounted for by differential visual feedback in the binocular and interocular delay conditions, nor is it likely to be a consequence of visual disruption due to the interocular delays. Our findings suggest that the visuomotor system has little tolerance to interocular delay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18493755     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1407-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  52 in total

1.  The role of visual feedback of hand position in the control of manual prehension.

Authors:  J D Connolly; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Perceptual illusion and the real-time control of action.

Authors:  David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2003

3.  STEREOSCOPIC DEPTH PERCEPTION AND EXPOSURE DELAY BETWEEN IMAGES TO THE TWO EYES.

Authors:  K N OGLE
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1963-11

4.  Differences in perceived depth for temporally correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random-dot stereograms.

Authors:  Elena Gheorghiu; Casper J Erkelens
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  An investigation of visual responses to brief stereoscopic stimuli.

Authors:  G R Engel
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.143

6.  Depth in anticorrelated stereograms: effects of spatial density and interocular delay.

Authors:  A I Cogan; A J Lomakin; A F Rossi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Binocular vision and the on-line control of human prehension.

Authors:  P Servos; M A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant?

Authors:  David C Knill; Jeffrey A Saunders
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Saunders; David C Knill
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.

Authors:  Andrea Loftus; Philip Servos; Melvyn A Goodale; Nicole Mendarozqueta; Mark Mon-Williams
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  1 in total

1.  Binocular and monocular depth cues in online feedback control of 3D pointing movement.

Authors:  Bo Hu; David C Knill
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.