Literature DB >> 8296465

A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues.

M J Young1, M S Landy, L T Maloney.   

Abstract

We examined how depth information from two different cue types (object motion and texture gradient) is integrated into a single estimate in human vision. Two critical assumptions of a recent model of depth cue combination (termed modified weak fusion) were tested. The first assumption is that the overall depth estimate is a weighted linear combination of the estimates derived from the individual cues, after initial processing needed to bring them to a common format. The second assumption is that the weight assigned to a cue reflects the apparent reliability of that cue in a particular scene. By this account, the depth combination rule is linear and dynamic, changing in a predictable fashion in response to the particular scene and viewing conditions. A novel procedure was used to measure the weights assigned to the texture and motion cues across experimental conditions. This procedure uses a type of perturbation analysis. The results are consistent with the weighted linear combination rule. In addition, when either cue is corrupted by added noise, the weighted linear combination rule shifts in favor of the uncontaminated cue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8296465     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90228-o

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  34 in total

1.  Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance.

Authors:  J R Tresilian; M Mon-Williams; B M Kelly
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Representation of 3-D surface orientation by velocity and disparity gradient cues in area MT.

Authors:  Takahisa M Sanada; Jerry D Nguyenkim; Gregory C Deangelis
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Knowing how much you don't know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Competition between newly recruited and pre-existing visual cues during the construction of visual appearance.

Authors:  Benjamin T Backus; Qi Haijiang
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Dynamic weighting of multisensory stimuli shapes decision-making in rats and humans.

Authors:  John P Sheppard; David Raposo; Anne K Churchland
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  How is motion disparity integrated with binocular disparity in depth perception?

Authors:  M Ichikawa; S Saida
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-02

7.  Multisensory decision-making in rats and humans.

Authors:  David Raposo; John P Sheppard; Paul R Schrater; Anne K Churchland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Motor learning reveals the existence of multiple codes for movement planning.

Authors:  Todd E Hudson; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Multisensory integration in the estimation of relative path length.

Authors:  Hong-Jin Sun; Jennifer L Campos; George S W Chan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Near-optimal integration of orientation information across saccades.

Authors:  Elad Ganmor; Michael S Landy; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.