Literature DB >> 9161314

Women's understanding of abnormal cervical smear test results: a qualitative interview study.

A M Kavanagh1, D H Broom.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe how women interpret their experiences of diagnosis and treatment of a cervical abnormality and how healthcare services for such women can be improved.
DESIGN: Qualitative study using detailed individual interviews.
SETTING: Australian gynaecology clinics.
SUBJECTS: 29 Women who had a cervical cytological abnormality and who attended a gynaecologist. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women's views on their diagnosis and their information needs.
RESULTS: Most women wanted to participate in decisions about their care but found it difficult to get the information they required from doctors because they were confused by what their doctors told them and felt unable to ask questions in the consultation. Medical terms such as wart virus and precancer were difficult to understand. Not being able to see their cervix also made it hard for women to understand what their abnormality meant and what treatment entailed. Most women tried to make sense of their abnormality in the context of their everyday lives. For some women their gynaecological care was not consistent with the way they understood their abnormality.
CONCLUSIONS: The inherent power structure of medical practice combined with time pressures often make it difficult for doctors to give the detailed information and reassurance patients need when a diagnosis is distressing or when investigation and treatment are strange and upsetting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9161314      PMCID: PMC2126646          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.314.7091.1388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  21 in total

Review 1.  Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour.

Authors:  F Fylan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  "Stay off the greens".

Authors:  R Newton; C C Cunningham
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Qualitative methods in research on healthcare quality.

Authors:  C Pope; P van Royen; R Baker
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-06

Review 4.  Use of decision aids to support informed choices about screening.

Authors:  Alexandra Barratt; Lyndal Trevena; Heather M Davey; Kirsten McCaffery
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-28

Review 5.  Health-related quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D in the prevention, screening and management of cervical disease: A systematic review.

Authors:  A Ó Céilleachair; J F O'Mahony; M O'Connor; J O'Leary; C Normand; C Martin; L Sharp
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  'Worse than HIV' or 'not as serious as other diseases'? Conceptualization of cervical cancer among newly screened women in Zambia.

Authors:  Heather L White; Chishimba Mulambia; Moses Sinkala; Mulindi H Mwanahamuntu; Groesbeck P Parham; Linda Moneyham; Diane M Grimley; Eric Chamot
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  Is default from colposcopy a problem, and if so what can we do? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  H Lester; S Wilson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  A question sheet to encourage written consultation questions.

Authors:  C Cunningham; R Newton
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-03

9.  Effect of health beliefs on delays in care for abnormal cervical cytology in a multi-ethnic population.

Authors:  Karin Nelson; Ann M Geiger; Carol M Mangione
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Women's experiences of abnormal cervical cytology: illness representations, care processes, and outcomes.

Authors:  Alison Karasz; M Diane McKee; Krista Roybal
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.