Literature DB >> 22646802

Avoiding piecemeal research on participation in cervical cancer screening: the advantages of a social identity framework.

Candice Tribe1, Janine Webb.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer screening research has predominantly focused on one type of participation, namely compliance with medical recommendations, and has largely ignored other types of participation. While there is some research that has taken a different approach, findings in this research area are not well integrated under a theoretical framework.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to show how consideration of a broader definition of participation and better integration of the theoretical conceptualization of participation in cervical cancer screening are both possible and desirable to enable a better understanding of women's experiences of cervical cancer screening specifically and to improve women's health generally. MAIN
CONCLUSION: It is suggested that alternative types of participation in cervical cancer screening warrant further investigation and that a social identity theoretical approach offers one way of integrating such conceptualizations of participation. The paper also argues for more explicit consideration of the role of social processes and of the variables, such as power, social identity and relational justice, which are involved in participation in cervical cancer screening.
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical cancer screening; participation; power; social identity; social justice

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22646802      PMCID: PMC5060747          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00779.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  80 in total

1.  Chinese women's experiences and images of the Pap smear examination.

Authors:  E Holroyd; S F Twinn; A T Shia
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.592

Review 2.  Community participation in health: perpetual allure, persistent challenge.

Authors:  L M Morgan
Journal:  Health Policy Plan       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.344

3.  Medical tests: women's reported and preferred decision-making roles and preferences for information on benefits, side-effects and false results.

Authors:  Heather M Davey; Alexandra L Barratt; Elizabeth Davey; Phyllis N Butow; Sally Redman; Nehmat Houssami; Glenn P Salkeld
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Breast and cervical cancer screening: impact of health insurance status, ethnicity, and nativity of Latinas.

Authors:  Michael A Rodríguez; Lisa M Ward; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  The role of education in the uptake of preventative health care: the case of cervical screening in Britain.

Authors:  Ricardo Sabates; Leon Feinstein
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Factors associated with Pap smear taking in general practice: focusing public health initiatives.

Authors:  A Heywood; D Firman; I Ring
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.939

7.  Influence of beliefs about cervical cancer etiology on Pap smear use among Latina immigrants.

Authors:  Juliet M McMullin; Israel De Alba; Leo R Chávez; F Allan Hubbell
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others.

Authors:  Richard L Street; Howard S Gordon; Michael M Ward; Edward Krupat; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Pap screening and knowledge of risk factors for cervical cancer in Chinese women in British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  T Gregory Hislop; Chong Teh; Agnes Lai; James D Ralston; Jianfen Shu; Victoria M Taylor
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.772

10.  Breast and cervical cancer screening for women between 50 and 69 years of age: what prompts women to screen?

Authors:  Baukje Bo Miedema; Sue Tatemichi
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct
View more
  2 in total

1.  Correlates of Rural, Appalachian, and Community Identity in the CITIES Cohort.

Authors:  Electra D Paskett; Gregory S Young; Brittany M Bernardo; Chasity Washington; Cecilia DeGraffinreid; James L Fisher; Timothy R Huerta
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  An empirical study of the 'underscreened' in organised cervical screening: experts focus on increasing opportunity as a way of reducing differences in screening rates.

Authors:  Jane H Williams; Stacy M Carter
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.