Literature DB >> 10615309

A social science perspective on screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.

B Duncan1, G Hart.   

Abstract

A recent report from the chief medical officer's expert advisory group on Chlamydia trachomatis has recommended the setting up of two pilot projects to assess the feasibility of introducing a national chlamydia screening programme. In addition to screening all symptomatic individuals and all attenders at genitourinary medicine clinics, the report recommends opportunistic screening of sexually active young women and women at high risk of infection, who are attending either general practice or family planning clinics. The success of any new screening programme depends on a wide variety of factors, not least the acceptability of such screening to its target population. In recent years, social scientists have made significant contributions to the understanding of the psychological factors which facilitate or inhibit uptake of screening services. The aim of this report is to discuss briefly the contribution social scientists could make to the chlamydia screening programme in the United Kingdom. In particular, the possible effects of screening for a stigmatized condition such as a sexually transmitted infection are explored.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10615309      PMCID: PMC1758218          DOI: 10.1136/sti.75.4.239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Infect        ISSN: 1368-4973            Impact factor:   3.519


  4 in total

Review 1.  Screening for cervical cancer: a review of women's attitudes, knowledge, and behaviour.

Authors:  F Fylan
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Sexuality and health: the hidden costs of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  B Duncan; G Hart
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-03

3.  Trends in the prevalence of chlamydial infections. The impact of community-wide testing.

Authors:  K J Mertz; W C Levine; D J Mosure; S M Berman; K J Dorian
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.830

4.  Work patterns of general practitioners before and after the introduction of the 1990 contract.

Authors:  R Chambers; J Belcher
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.386

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Psychosocial impact of Chlamydia trachomatis testing in general practice.

Authors:  Ida Kangas; Berit Andersen; Frede Olesen; Jens K Møller; Lars Østergaard
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Implementing chlamydia screening: what do women think? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Natasha L Pavlin; Jane M Gunn; Rhian Parker; Christopher K Fairley; Jane Hocking
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.295

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.