Literature DB >> 26921001

Performing Testicular Self-Examination, Driving Automobiles, and Anxiety: What Is the Logical Link?

Michael J Rovito1.   

Abstract

The debate of whether testicular self-examination (TSE) should be promoted among males generally centers on a harm-benefit corollary. The benefits of TSE include improving health outcomes, inclusive of an increase in both quality of life and knowledge/awareness of potential health concerns, as well as promoting proactivity in achieving wellness. The harms include claims that false-positive results can increase anxiety and produce costs via unnecessary treatments and therapies. Further claims point to the lack of evidence suggesting TSE decreases testicular cancer mortality. This commentary primarily discusses the anxiety portion of this debate from a logic-based perspective. The argument that TSE should not be promoted among males due to the risk of inciting false-positive anxiety appears to be flawed. A 5-point perspective is presented on the illogical discouragement of TSE due to theorized levels of false-positive anxiety while existing evidence suggests late-stage testicular cancer is associated with anxiety and depression.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health promotion and disease prevention; preventive medicine; testicular cancer; testicular self-examination

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26921001      PMCID: PMC5987949          DOI: 10.1177/1557988316635048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Mens Health        ISSN: 1557-9883


  15 in total

1.  Routine testicular self examination: it's time to stop.

Authors:  Keith Hopcroft
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-03-28

2.  Screening for testicular cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  "Off-Label" Usage of Testicular Self-Examination (TSE): Benefits Beyond Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Michael J Rovito; James E Leone; Chase T Cavayero
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2015-05-19

4.  Getting youth to Check it Out!®: a new approach to teaching self-screening.

Authors:  Resa M Jones; Ian J Wallace; Alice Westerberg; Kristyn N Hoy; John M Quillin; Steven J Danish
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2015-03

5.  Scrotal signs and symptoms in the general population, the value of testis self-examination and the pitfalls of a scrotal screening programme: is the two-week rule relevant?

Authors:  R G Casey; R Grainger; M Butler; T E D McDermott; J A Thornhill
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Evaluation of two health education strategies for testicular self-examination.

Authors:  J W Finney; M D Weist; P C Friman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1995

Review 7.  Screening for testicular cancer: an evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Kenneth Lin; Ruta Sharangpani
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Quality of life among testis cancer survivors.

Authors:  Timothy Gilligan
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.498

9.  Sudden death as a complication of choriocarcinoma.

Authors:  Siddhartha Das; Bhawana Badhe; Asma Bibi; Manoj K Mohanty
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 1.832

10.  Testicular self-examination and testicular cancer: a cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  Michael Aberger; Bradley Wilson; Jeffrey M Holzbeierlein; Tomas L Griebling; Ajay K Nangia
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.452

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  From 'D' to 'I': A critique of the current United States preventive services task force recommendation for testicular cancer screening.

Authors:  Michael J Rovito; Janna Manjelievskaia; James E Leone; Michael J Lutz; Ajay Nangia
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-04-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.