Literature DB >> 9935275

Comparative tolerability of erythromycin and newer macrolide antibacterials in paediatric patients.

N Principi1, S Esposito.   

Abstract

The macrolides are a well established group of antibacterials frequently used in general practice. The most frequently used macrolides in paediatric patients are erythromycin, a naturally occurring compound, and clarithromycin and azithromycin, recently developed macrolides. Overall adverse effect rates of 7 to 26% for erythromycin, 14 to 26% for clarithromycin, and 6 to 27% for azithromycin have been described in children. Adverse gastrointestinal effects, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and abdominal cramps, are the most common problems in children. Allergic reactions, hepatotoxicity, ototoxicity and adverse effects involving the central and peripheral nervous systems have also been observed in children. Stevens-Johnson, Schonlein-Henoch and Churg-Strauss syndromes have been rarely described in children. Treatment-related laboratory abnormalities have been recorded in 2 to 4% of erythromycin- and in 0 to 1% of both clarithromycin- and azithromycin-treated children. Elevation in liver function tests was the most common abnormality cited. Increased macrolide use in children in recent years has resulted in a growing potential for drug interactions between them and other pharmacologically active agents via the inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) microsomal enzymes. Drug interactions with theophylline, cyclosporin, carbamazepine, terfenadine and warfarin limit erythromycin use. Clarithromycin is a weak inducer of CYP and exhibits fewer drug-drug interactions than erythromycin. However, its use with theophylline, carbamazepine and terfenadine is contraindicated. In contrast, no significant interactions have been reported with azithromycin to date. Macrolides have been proven to be well tolerated in the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and also in less frequent infections occurring in paediatric patients. In addition, clarithromycin and azithromycin have shown good tolerability profiles in immunocompromised paediatric patients. In conclusion, macrolides antibacterials have proven to be well tolerated in paediatric patients. Although the incidence of adverse effects is similar with the use of erythromycin and the newer macrolides, drug interactions occur significantly less when clarithromycin or azithromycin are administered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9935275     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-199920010-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  95 in total

Review 1.  [QT prolongation and circulatory arrest after an injection of erythromycin in a newborn infant].

Authors:  A Benoit; C Bodiou; E Villain; F Bavoux; A Checoury; J Badoual
Journal:  Arch Fr Pediatr       Date:  1991-01

2.  Activity of azithromycin against cryptosporidia in immunosuppressed rats.

Authors:  J E Rehg
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 3.  Treatment of skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  J W Bass
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  The effect of prescribed daily dose frequency on patient medication compliance.

Authors:  S A Eisen; D K Miller; R S Woodward; E Spitznagel; T R Przybeck
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-09

5.  Chemotherapeutic effect of azithromycin and lasalocid on Cryptosporidium infection in mice.

Authors:  I Kimata; S Uni; M Iseki
Journal:  J Protozool       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec

6.  Changes in the pharmacokinetics and electrocardiographic pharmacodynamics of terfenadine with concomitant administration of erythromycin.

Authors:  P K Honig; R L Woosley; K Zamani; D P Conner; L R Cantilena
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Comparative activity of macrolides against Toxoplasma gondii demonstrating utility of an in vitro microassay.

Authors:  S Chamberland; H A Kirst; W L Current
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of macrolides.

Authors:  P Periti; T Mazzei; E Mini; A Novelli
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Macrolide-antifol synergism in anti-Pneumocystis carinii therapeutics.

Authors:  W T Hughes
Journal:  J Protozool       Date:  1991 Nov-Dec

Review 10.  Tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, erythromycin, clindamycin, and metronidazole.

Authors:  J D Smilack; W R Wilson; F R Cockerill
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.616

View more
  26 in total

1.  No clinically significant effect of erythromycin or azithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of voriconazole in healthy male volunteers.

Authors:  Lynn Purkins; Nolan Wood; Parviz Ghahramani; Diane Kleinermans; Gary Layton; Don Nichols
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Clinical Efficacy of Azithromycin as an Adjunctive Therapy to Non-Surgical Periodontal Treatment of Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Antonio Renatus; Jörg Herrmann; Antje Schönfelder; Fabian Schwarzenberger; Holger Jentsch
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-07-01

Review 3.  Non-surgical periodontal therapy supplemented with systemically administered azithromycin: a systematic review of RCTs.

Authors:  Sabrina L Buset; Nicola U Zitzmann; Roland Weiger; Clemens Walter
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Antibacterial and immunomodulatory properties of azithromycin treatment implications for periodontitis.

Authors:  P M Bartold; A H du Bois; S Gannon; D R Haynes; R S Hirsch
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.473

5.  Safety and tolerability of clarithromycin administered to children at higher-than-recommended doses.

Authors:  D A Kafetzis; F Chantzi; G Tigani; C L Skevaki
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 6.  Drug-Induced Small Bowel Injury: a Challenging and Often Forgotten Clinical Condition.

Authors:  Carmelo Scarpignato; Ingvar Bjarnason
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-11-13

Review 7.  Asthma in children: are chlamydia or mycoplasma involved?

Authors:  S Esposito; N Principi
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 8.  Macrolides: from in vitro anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties to clinical practice in respiratory diseases.

Authors:  P Zarogoulidis; N Papanas; I Kioumis; E Chatzaki; E Maltezos; K Zarogoulidis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  Community-acquired pneumonia in children: issues in optimizing antibacterial treatment.

Authors:  Matti Korppi
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 10.  Hypersensitivity reactions to non-beta-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  Stephen A Tilles; Christopher G Slatore
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.667

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.