Literature DB >> 9931521

Do sick newborn infants benefit from participation in a randomized clinical trial?

B Schmidt1, P Gillie, C Caco, J Roberts, R Roberts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adult participants in randomized controlled trials often have better outcomes than patients who are eligible but not enrolled.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether newborn infants who were allocated to placebo in an investigational drug trial had better outcomes than infants who were eligible but not randomized (eligible NR). STUDY
DESIGN: During a randomized controlled trial of antithrombin therapy in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome, data were collected prospectively on all 76 infants in the eligible NR group. Study outcomes were compared with those of all 61 infants who were randomized to placebo. The same exogenous surfactant was used in all patients.
RESULTS: In the placebo group the mean (SD) birth weight was 1201 (314) g, mean (SD) gestational age was 28.8 (2.3) weeks, and 51% were male. In infants in the eligible NR group, mean (SD) birth weight was 1141 (262) g, mean (SD) gestational age was 28.3 (2. 3) weeks, and 58% were male; 57% of infants in both groups had been exposed to steroids before birth. The median duration of mechanical ventilation was reduced from 6.2 days in the eligible NR group to 4. 8 days in the placebo group (P =.008). There was also a trend toward less frequent and less severe intraventricular hemorrhage in trial participants.
CONCLUSIONS: These data are consistent with the hypothesis that sick newborn infants may benefit from participation in a randomized controlled trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9931521     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(99)70428-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  18 in total

1.  Clinical trials in children: problems and pitfalls.

Authors:  R E Kauffman
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.022

2.  Presumed consent in emergency neonatal research.

Authors:  D J Manning
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Consent for clinical research in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective survey and a prospective study.

Authors:  E Burgess; N Singhal; H Amin; D D McMillan; H Devrome
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Enrollment of extremely low birth weight infants in a clinical research study may not be representative.

Authors:  Wade Rich; Neil N Finer; Marie G Gantz; Nancy S Newman; Angelita M Hensman; Ellen C Hale; Kathy J Auten; Kurt Schibler; Roger G Faix; Abbot R Laptook; Bradley A Yoder; Abhik Das; Seetha Shankaran
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  What do parents think about enrolling their premature babies in several research studies?

Authors:  C J Morley; R Lau; P G Davis; C Morse
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  What factors are important to parents making decisions about neonatal research?

Authors:  K S Hoehn; G Wernovsky; J Rychik; J W Gaynor; T L Spray; C Feudtner; R M Nelson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.747

7.  Mothers of babies enrolled in a randomized trial immediately after birth report a positive experience.

Authors:  D L Harris; P J Weston; J E Harding
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.521

8.  Do clinical trials improve quality of care? A comparison of clinical processes and outcomes in patients in a clinical trial and similar patients outside a trial where both groups are managed according to a strict protocol.

Authors:  J West; J Wright; D Tuffnell; D Jankowicz; R West
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2005-06

9.  Indirect Benefits in HIV Cure Clinical Research: A Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Gilbertson; Elizabeth Poole Kelly; Stuart Rennie; Gail Henderson; JoAnn Kuruc; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.205

10.  Positive Social Impacts Related to Participation in an HIV Prevention Trial Involving People Who Inject Drugs.

Authors:  Jeremy Sugarman; Randy Stalter; Kevin Bokoch; Ting-Yuan Liu; Deborah Donnell
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.