BACKGROUND: Although parents of neonates with congenital heart disease are often asked permission for their neonates to participate in research studies, little is known about the factors parents consider when making these decisions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the reasons for parents' decisions about participation in research studies. METHODS: Qualitative analysis of the unsolicited comments of 34 parents regarding reasons for agreeing or declining to participate in research studies. Parents' comments were offered spontaneously during interviews about clinical care decisions for neonates with congenital heart disease. RESULTS: Parents cited five types of reason for or against permitting their newborn to participate in research studies: societal benefit (n = 18), individual benefit for their infant (n = 16), risk of study participation (n = 10), perception that participation posed no harm (n = 9), and anti-experimentation views (n = 4). CONCLUSION: Addressing parental decision making in the light of these reasons could enhance the parental permission process for parents of critically ill neonates.
BACKGROUND: Although parents of neonates with congenital heart disease are often asked permission for their neonates to participate in research studies, little is known about the factors parents consider when making these decisions. OBJECTIVE: To determine the reasons for parents' decisions about participation in research studies. METHODS: Qualitative analysis of the unsolicited comments of 34 parents regarding reasons for agreeing or declining to participate in research studies. Parents' comments were offered spontaneously during interviews about clinical care decisions for neonates with congenital heart disease. RESULTS: Parents cited five types of reason for or against permitting their newborn to participate in research studies: societal benefit (n = 18), individual benefit for their infant (n = 16), risk of study participation (n = 10), perception that participation posed no harm (n = 9), and anti-experimentation views (n = 4). CONCLUSION: Addressing parental decision making in the light of these reasons could enhance the parental permission process for parents of critically ill neonates.
Entities:
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach
Authors: J William Gaynor; Marsha Gerdes; Elaine H Zackai; Judy Bernbaum; Gil Wernovsky; Robert R Clancy; Mark F Newman; Ann M Saunders; Patrick J Heagerty; Jo Ann D'Agostino; Donna McDonald-McGinn; Susan C Nicolson; Thomas L Spray; Gail P Jarvik Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Nancy A Pike; Victoria Pemberton; Kerstin Allen; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Daphne T Hsu; Alan B Lewis; Nancy Ghanayem; Linda Lambert; Kari Crawford; Teresa Atz; Rosalind Korsin; Mingfen Xu; Chitra Ravishankar; James Cnota; Gail D Pearson Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 1.093
Authors: Alexandra Dreyzin; Amber E Barnato; Kyle A Soltys; Coreen Farris; Rachel Sada; Kimberly Haberman; Ira J Fox Journal: Pediatr Transplant Date: 2013-11-20
Authors: Jon Dorling; Oliver Hewer; Madeleine Hurd; Vasha Bari; Beth Bosiak; Ursula Bowler; Andrew King; Louise Linsell; David Murray; Omar Omar; Christopher Partlett; Catherine Rounding; John Townend; Jane Abbott; Janet Berrington; Elaine Boyle; Nicholas Embleton; Samantha Johnson; Alison Leaf; Kenny McCormick; William McGuire; Mehali Patel; Tracy Roberts; Ben Stenson; Warda Tahir; Mark Monahan; Judy Richards; Judith Rankin; Edmund Juszczak Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 4.014