C J Morley1, R Lau, P G Davis, C Morse. 1. Neonatal Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VictoriaC 3053, Australia. colin.morley@rwh.org.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate parents' opinions about enrolling their premature baby into several research studies in the few days after birth. METHODOLOGY: A questionnaire was given to parents of premature babies in the neonatal intensive care unit who had been invited to join several studies (two to seven). RESULTS: All 50 mothers and 42 of 48 fathers completed the questionnaire independently; 28% had been asked to join two studies, 32% three, 24% four, 14% five, and 2% six studies. There were 61 babies with mean (SD) gestational age 26.9 (1.6) weeks and birth weight 877 (249) g. Nearly three quarters (71%) of the parents thought it was very good for their baby to be in a hospital that was carrying out a lot of research. Most (93%) thought that their baby would get the same or better care in a study. Only 15% thought their baby was too small for research studies. Almost all (98%) wanted to be involved in the decision about their baby joining a study. Only 22% were worried about the number of studies; 10% would not enroll their baby in any studies, but 74% were willing for their baby to join two or more studies, and 10% would enroll in all the studies. Most (94%) believed that their baby's participation would improve care of future babies. CONCLUSIONS: Most of these parents were willing to join several studies. The majority were not worried about their baby participating in the studies. The profession needs to be aware that parents are supportive of neonatal research and participation in multiple studies.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate parents' opinions about enrolling their premature baby into several research studies in the few days after birth. METHODOLOGY: A questionnaire was given to parents of premature babies in the neonatal intensive care unit who had been invited to join several studies (two to seven). RESULTS: All 50 mothers and 42 of 48 fathers completed the questionnaire independently; 28% had been asked to join two studies, 32% three, 24% four, 14% five, and 2% six studies. There were 61 babies with mean (SD) gestational age 26.9 (1.6) weeks and birth weight 877 (249) g. Nearly three quarters (71%) of the parents thought it was very good for their baby to be in a hospital that was carrying out a lot of research. Most (93%) thought that their baby would get the same or better care in a study. Only 15% thought their baby was too small for research studies. Almost all (98%) wanted to be involved in the decision about their baby joining a study. Only 22% were worried about the number of studies; 10% would not enroll their baby in any studies, but 74% were willing for their baby to join two or more studies, and 10% would enroll in all the studies. Most (94%) believed that their baby's participation would improve care of future babies. CONCLUSIONS: Most of these parents were willing to join several studies. The majority were not worried about their baby participating in the studies. The profession needs to be aware that parents are supportive of neonatal research and participation in multiple studies.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach
Authors: Nancy A Pike; Victoria Pemberton; Kerstin Allen; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Daphne T Hsu; Alan B Lewis; Nancy Ghanayem; Linda Lambert; Kari Crawford; Teresa Atz; Rosalind Korsin; Mingfen Xu; Chitra Ravishankar; James Cnota; Gail D Pearson Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 1.093
Authors: Wade D Rich; Kathy J Auten; Marie G Gantz; Ellen C Hale; Angelita M Hensman; Nancy S Newman; Neil N Finer Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Jon Dorling; Oliver Hewer; Madeleine Hurd; Vasha Bari; Beth Bosiak; Ursula Bowler; Andrew King; Louise Linsell; David Murray; Omar Omar; Christopher Partlett; Catherine Rounding; John Townend; Jane Abbott; Janet Berrington; Elaine Boyle; Nicholas Embleton; Samantha Johnson; Alison Leaf; Kenny McCormick; William McGuire; Mehali Patel; Tracy Roberts; Ben Stenson; Warda Tahir; Mark Monahan; Judy Richards; Judith Rankin; Edmund Juszczak Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 4.014