Literature DB >> 12819158

Consent for clinical research in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective survey and a prospective study.

E Burgess1, N Singhal, H Amin, D D McMillan, H Devrome.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recruitment into research studies in the neonatal intensive care unit has been problematic. Therefore suggestions have been made to take decision making about enrollment out of the hands of the parents.
OBJECTIVE: To understand parental perceptions of the process of recruitment and enrollment for research in the neonatal intensive care unit.
METHOD: A questionnaire was developed and used in both a retrospective survey and a prospective study of parents whose newborns were enrolled in trials in a neonatal intensive care unit. Closed ended and open ended questions were included, as well as demographic questions.
RESULTS: The retrospective survey had a 79% response rate (29 of 38). Overall, 90% of parents felt that they had made informed decisions, and 93% were against the option that a doctor decide if the newborn should be enrolled into a study, rather than the parent. Although some parents (38%) found that recruitment did add "stress to an already stressful situation", 90% felt that they had made informed decisions and understood the elements of the study. Most parents had been requested to enroll their newborn into more than one trial, and, on average, they thought that they would be comfortable with enrollment into two studies (range 0-6). When asked how the process could be improved, parents suggested that information be made available before delivery. The responses of parents in the prospective study were mostly consistent with those from the retrospective survey.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall the parents did not support the suggestion that decision making about enrollment be taken away from parents and put into the hands of doctors. The healthcare team should support parents in their role of decision maker, enhance availability of the research staff, and provide more information about the research.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12819158      PMCID: PMC1721584          DOI: 10.1136/fn.88.4.f280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  19 in total

1.  Obtaining informed consent to neonatal randomised controlled trials: interviews with parents and clinicians in the Euricon study.

Authors:  S A Mason; P J Allmark
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-12-16       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Parents' perceptions of research with newborns.

Authors:  Nalini Singhal; Kathleen Oberle; Ellen Burgess; Joelene Huber-Okrainec
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  Is it in a neonate's best interest to enter a randomised controlled trial?

Authors:  P Allmark; S Mason; A B Gill; C Megone
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  The social filter effect of informed consent in clinical research.

Authors:  Y H Thong; S C Harth
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Clinical trials and neonatal intensive care.

Authors:  N Modi
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  New approach for recruitment into randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  M Baum
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-03-27       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The future of clinical experimentation in neonatal medicine.

Authors:  W A Silverman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Characteristics of preterm delivery and low birthweight among 113,994 infants in Alberta: 1994-1996.

Authors:  S C Tough; L W Svenson; D W Johnston; D Schopflocher
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

9.  A new design for randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  M Zelen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Parental perceptions and attitudes about informed consent in clinical research involving children.

Authors:  S C Harth; Y H Thong
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  32 in total

1.  Neonatal research: the parental perspective.

Authors:  B J Stenson; J-C Becher; N McIntosh
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Neonatal research: parent's perception of informed consent.

Authors:  Suksham Jain; Deepak Chawla; Anuradha Bansal
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 3.  Participation in multiple neonatal research studies.

Authors:  M Ward Platt
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Mothers of babies enrolled in a randomized trial immediately after birth report a positive experience.

Authors:  D L Harris; P J Weston; J E Harding
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 5.  Oncofertility and informed consent: addressing beliefs, values, and future decision making.

Authors:  Felicia Cohn
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2010

6.  Parents' views of involvement in concurrent research with their neonates.

Authors:  Frances Rieth Ward
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 7.  Consent for neonatal research.

Authors:  L McKechnie; A B Gill
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.747

8.  Chaos, vulnerability and control: parental beliefs about neonatal clinical trials.

Authors:  F R Ward
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  Attitudes to drug trials among relatives of unconscious intensive care patients.

Authors:  Anders Perner; Michael Ibsen; Jan Bonde
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Neutrophil and monocyte adhesion molecules in bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and effects of corticosteroids.

Authors:  P Ballabh; M Simm; J Kumari; A N Krauss; A Jain; C Califano; M L Lesser; S Cunningham-Rundles
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.747

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.