Literature DB >> 33205361

In Vitro Study of a Stentless Aortic Bioprosthesis Made of Bacterial Cellulose.

Kinga Dawidowska1, Piotr Siondalski2, Magdalena Kołaczkowska2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The paper present findings from an in vitro experimental study of a stentless human aortic bioprosthesis (HAB) made of bacterial cellulose (BC). Three variants of the basic model were designed and tested to identify the valve prosthesis with the best performance parameters. The modified models were made of BC, and the basic model of pericardium.
METHODS: Each model (named V1, V2 and V3) was implanted into a 90 mm porcine aorta. Effective Orifice Area (EOA), rapid valve opening time (RVOT) and rapid valve closing time (RVCT) were determined. The flow resistance of each bioprosthesis model during the simulated heart systole, i.e. for the mean differential pressure (ΔP) at the time of full valve opening was measured. All experimental specimens were exposed to a mean blood pressure (MBP) of 90.5 ± 2.3 mmHg.
RESULTS: The V3 model demonstrated the best performance. The index defining the maximum opening of the bioprosthesis during systole for models V1, V2 and V3 was 2.67 ± 0.59, 2.04 ± 0.23 and 2.85 ± 0.59 cm2, respectively. The mean flow rate through the V3 valve was 5.7 ± 1, 6.9 ± 0.7 and 8.9 ± 1.4 l/min for stroke volume (SV) of 65, 90 and 110 mL, respectively. The phase of immediate opening and closure for models V1, V2 and V3 was 8, 7 and 5% of the cycle duration, respectively. The mean flow resistance of the models was: 4.07 ± 2.1, 4.28 ± 2.51 and 5.6 ± 2.32 mmHg.
CONCLUSIONS: The V3 model of the aortic valve prosthesis is the most effective. In vivo tests using BC as a structural material for this model are recommended. The response time of the V3 model to changed work conditions is comparable to that of a healthy human heart. The model functions as an aortic valve prosthesis in in vitro conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic bioprosthesis; Aortic valve prosthesis; Bacterial cellulose; HAB; Human aortic bioprosthesis; Nanocelulose

Year:  2020        PMID: 33205361      PMCID: PMC7782396          DOI: 10.1007/s13239-020-00500-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol        ISSN: 1869-408X            Impact factor:   2.495


  30 in total

1.  Opening and closing characteristics of the aortic valve after valve-sparing procedures using a new aortic root conduit.

Authors:  R De Paulis; G M De Matteis; P Nardi; R Scaffa; M M Buratta; L Chiariello
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Polyurethane artificial heart valves in animals.

Authors:  T AKUTSU; B DREYER; W J KOLFF
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1959-11       Impact factor: 3.531

Review 3.  Applications of bacterial cellulose and its composites in biomedicine.

Authors:  J M Rajwade; K M Paknikar; J V Kumbhar
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Tissue valve is the preferred option for patients aged 60 and older.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Kaneko; Lawrence H Cohn; Sary F Aranki
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Hemodynamic performance of the Edwards Prima Plus stentless valve at 1 year.

Authors:  Keizo Tanaka; Toshihiko Kinoshita; Kazuya Fujinaga; Shinji Kanemitsu; Jin Tanaka; Hitoshi Suzuki; Toshiya Tokui
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-09-13

6.  Clinical experience with the freedom SOLO stentless aortic valve in 277 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Markus Thalmann; Josef Kaiblinger; Richard Krausler; Harald Pisarik; Franz Veit; Niuscha Taheri; Karin Kornigg; Christian Dinges; Martin Grabenwöger; Olaf Stanger
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 7.  New flexible polymeric heart valve prostheses for the mitral and aortic positions.

Authors:  Sabine H Daebritz; Bernd Fausten; Benita Hermanns; Andreas Franke; Joerg Schroeder; Jan Groetzner; Ruediger Autschbach; Bruno J Messmer; Jörg S Sachweh
Journal:  Heart Surg Forum       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 0.676

8.  Tricuspid leaflet aortic valve prosthesis.

Authors:  B B Roe; P B Kelly; J L Myers; D W Moore
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1966-04       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Clinical and haemodynamic outcomes in 804 patients receiving the Freedom SOLO stentless aortic valve: results from an international prospective multicentre study.

Authors:  Herko Grubitzsch; Shaohua Wang; Klaus Matschke; Mattia Glauber; David Heimansohn; Erwin Tan; Katrien Francois; Markus Thalmann
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database.

Authors:  James M Brown; Sean M O'Brien; Changfu Wu; Jo Ann H Sikora; Bartley P Griffith; James S Gammie
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.209

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial Cellulose Properties Fulfilling Requirements for a Biomaterial of Choice in Reconstructive Surgery and Wound Healing.

Authors:  Jerzy Jankau; Agata Błażyńska-Spychalska; Katarzyna Kubiak; Marzena Jędrzejczak-Krzepkowska; Teresa Pankiewicz; Karolina Ludwicka; Aleksandra Dettlaff; Rafał Pęksa
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-02-11

2.  Highly Aligned Bacterial Nanocellulose Films Obtained During Static Biosynthesis in a Reproducible and Straightforward Approach.

Authors:  Nerea Murugarren; Soledad Roig-Sanchez; Irene Antón-Sales; Nanthilde Malandain; Kai Xu; Eduardo Solano; Juan Sebastian Reparaz; Anna Laromaine
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 17.521

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.