Literature DB >> 9926961

Predicting the position of the femoral head center.

N Sugano1, P C Noble, E Kamaric.   

Abstract

To find an accurate method to predict the position of the normal head center in severely deformed hips without a contralateral reference, we studied the relationships between the head center and dimensions of the normal proximal femur using cadaveric specimens. From a large anatomic collection, 32 cadaveric femora with neck-shaft angles ranging from 115 to 146 were selected. The two parameters with the greatest correlation with the height of the femoral head were the height of the neck isthmus (r = .932) and the lowest point of neck saddle (r = .790). Medial head offset was most strongly correlated with the offset of the neck isthmus (r = .945) and the distance from the medullary axis to the outer borders of the medial cortex at the +30% level (r = .861). As a rule of thumb, the height of the head center can be predicted as the height of the midpoint of the neck isthmus plus 10 mm or as the height of the neck saddle with an accuracy of +/-5.1 mm and +/-8.3 mm. The offset of the head center can be predicted as the offset of the midpoint of the neck isthmus plus 15 mm or as the distance from the medullary axis to the medial cortex at the +30% level plus 15 mm with an accuracy of +/-4.6 mm and +/-6.3 mm.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9926961     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90210-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  12 in total

1.  A comparison of two implant systems in restoration of hip geometry in arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael J Archibeck; Tamara Cummins; Joshua Carothers; Daniel W Junick; Richard E White
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Are the left and right proximal femurs symmetric?

Authors:  Ernest Y Young; Jeremy Gebhart; Daniel Cooperman; Nicholas U Ahn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Patient perceived outcomes after primary hip arthroplasty: does gender matter?

Authors:  Carlos J Lavernia; Jose C Alcerro; Juan S Contreras; Mark D Rossi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Hip offset in total hip arthroplasty: quantitative measurement with navigation.

Authors:  Manish Dastane; Lawrence D Dorr; Rupesh Tarwala; Zhinian Wan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Can Lateral Offset Be Used as a Predictive Marker for Proximal Femur Disorders?

Authors:  Bilge İpek Torun; Simel Kendir; Ferhat Geneci; Muhammed B Uzuner; Mert Ocak; Burak Bilecenoğlu; Çetin Işık; Kadir Desdicioğlu
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Acetabular morphology: implications for joint-preserving surgery.

Authors:  Werner Köhnlein; Reinhold Ganz; Franco M Impellizzeri; Michael Leunig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Modular versus nonmodular neck femoral implants in primary total hip arthroplasty: which is better?

Authors:  Paul J Duwelius; Bob Burkhart; Clay Carnahan; Grant Branam; Laura Matsen Ko; Yingxing Wu; Cecily Froemke; Lian Wang; Gary Grunkemeier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Morphological consistency of bilateral hip joints in adults based on the X-ray and CT data.

Authors:  Ran Zhao; Hong Cai; Hua Tian; Ke Zhang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  Anthropometric measurements to design best-fit femoral stem for the Indian population.

Authors:  Br Rawal; Rahul Ribeiro; Rajesh Malhotra; Naresh Bhatnagar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Anthropometric analysis of the hip joint in South Indian population using computed tomography.

Authors:  Vetrivel Chezian Sengodan; Elangovan Sinmayanantham; J Saravana Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.