Literature DB >> 20700673

Patient perceived outcomes after primary hip arthroplasty: does gender matter?

Carlos J Lavernia1, Jose C Alcerro, Juan S Contreras, Mark D Rossi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) provides high functional scores and long-term survivorship. However, differences in function and disability between men and women before and after arthroplasty are not well understood. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined if there was a gender difference in patient-perceived functional measures and range of motion in primary THA.
METHODS: We retrospectively studied 532 patients (658 hips) undergoing primary THA. A total of 59% were women and 41% were men. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at minimum 2 years using Quality of Well-being, SF-36, WOMAC, and Harris hip score. We determined if differences existed between genders before and at followup for all dependent measures. Independent t-tests were also used to determine differences between genders concerning the change (Δ) scores and hip range of motion. The time course of perceived functional recovery was also documented.
RESULTS: Males were on average 5 years (58) younger than females (63). Before surgery, females scored worse than males on the Harris hip score, WOMAC function, WOMAC pain, and WOMAC total scores. All scores improved at followup in both groups. Regardless of time, females had lower scores than males. However, females had greater improvement over males for WOMAC function (39 versus 35), WOMAC pain (11 versus 10), and WOMAC total (53 versus 48).
CONCLUSIONS: Substantial gender functional differences exist before treatment. However, women reported greater improvement as a result of the intervention when compared with men. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20700673      PMCID: PMC3018219          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1503-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  24 in total

Review 1.  Economic evaluation in total hip arthroplasty: analysis and review of the literature.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Khaled J Saleh; Aaron G Rosenberg; Harry E Rubash
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

Authors:  N Bellamy; W W Buchanan; C H Goldsmith; J Campbell; L W Stitt
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  The effect of aging on the shape of the proximal femur.

Authors:  P C Noble; G G Box; E Kamaric; M J Fink; J W Alexander; H S Tullos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Age and waiting time as predictors of outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  A-K Nilsdotter; L S Lohmander
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.580

7.  Gender differences in processing information for making self-assessments of health.

Authors:  Y Benyamini; E A Leventhal; H Leventhal
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.312

8.  Differences between men and women undergoing major orthopedic surgery for degenerative arthritis.

Authors:  J N Katz; E A Wright; E Guadagnoli; M H Liang; E W Karlson; P D Cleary
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1994-05

9.  Complications and failure after total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Adrienne A Spirt; Mathieu Assal; Sigvard T Hansen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Is postoperative function after hip or knee arthroplasty influenced by preoperative functional levels?

Authors:  Carlos Lavernia; Michele D'Apuzzo; Mark D Rossi; David Lee
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  11 in total

1.  Improvement of activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty using a computed tomography-based navigation system.

Authors:  Yuki Maeda; Nobuo Nakamura; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 2.  Do we need gender-specific total joint arthroplasty?

Authors:  Aaron J Johnson; Christopher R Costa; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Does ipsilateral knee pain improve after hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Wenbao Wang; Jeffrey A Geller; Jonathan D Nyce; Jung Keun Choi; William Macaulay
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [More muscle mass in men: explanatory model for superior outcome after total hip arthroplasty].

Authors:  B Preininger; K Schmorl; P von Roth; T Winkler; G Matziolis; C Perka; S Tohtz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Gender-specific correlates of complementary and alternative medicine use for knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Rachel Jawahar; Shibing Yang; Charles B Eaton; Timothy McAlindon; Kate L Lapane
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 6.  Predictors of physical functioning after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  L D Buirs; L W A H Van Beers; V A B Scholtes; T Pastoors; S Sprague; R W Poolman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Does gender influence the outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty in patients with ankle osteoarthritis?

Authors:  Gun-Woo Lee; Keun-Bae Lee
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Assessment of asymmetric leg loading before and after total hip arthroplasty using instrumented shoes.

Authors:  Alicia Martínez-Ramírez; Dirk Weenk; Pablo Lecumberri; Nico Verdonschot; Dean Pakvis; Peter H Veltink
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Patient-reported quality of life after primary major joint arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zoe H Dailiana; Ippolyti Papakostidou; Sokratis Varitimidis; Lycurgos Liaropoulos; Elias Zintzaras; Theofilos Karachalios; Emmanuel Michelinakis; Konstantinos N Malizos
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Different Combining Process Between Male and Female Patients to Reach Their Overall Satisfaction.

Authors:  Koichiro Otani; Paula R Buchanan; Samir P Desai; Patrick A Herrmann
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2016-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.