Literature DB >> 35342526

Can Lateral Offset Be Used as a Predictive Marker for Proximal Femur Disorders?

Bilge İpek Torun1, Simel Kendir2, Ferhat Geneci1, Muhammed B Uzuner3, Mert Ocak4, Burak Bilecenoğlu5, Çetin Işık6, Kadir Desdicioğlu1.   

Abstract

Purpose: When the lateral offset (LO) changes, the forces acting on the head and neck of the femur change. Increase or decrease in LO can cause instability and possible dislocation of the implant. In addition, when the offset is reduced, more force is needed to balance the pelvis by the abductor muscles, and the force that occurs along the hip joint increases and causes wear and tear. In this study we aimed to investigate whether there is a correlation between LO and proximal femur morphology, and according to the results we aimed to investigate whether the LO can be used as a predictive marker for the risk of femoral neck fractures, osteoarthritis or femoroacetabular impingement.
Methods: Femur length, femur neck length, femoral neck-shaft angle (NSA), anteroposterior (a-p) and superoinferior (s-i) diameters of femoral head and neck, and LO were measured on 82 dry adult femora of unknown age and gender from Turkish population.
Results: There was no statistically significant correlation between the LO and a-p and s-i diameters of femoral head or neck. However, there was found statistically significant correlation between LO and femoral NSA (p < 0.01), femoral neck length (p < 0.05) and femur length (p < 0.01).
Conclusion: High LO values can be used as an indicator for neck fractures, a negative marker for OA, but LO does not appear to be used as an indicator for FAI. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoro-acetabular impingement; Femur; Osteoarthritis; Total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 35342526      PMCID: PMC8921468          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00576-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.251


  36 in total

1.  Achieving stability and lower-limb length in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Keith R Berend; Scott M Sporer; Rafael J Sierra; Andrew H Glassman; Michael J Morris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Nonspherical femoral head shape (pistol grip deformity), neck shaft angle, and risk of hip osteoarthritis: a case-control study.

Authors:  Michael Doherty; Philip Courtney; Sally Doherty; Wendy Jenkins; Rose A Maciewicz; Kenneth Muir; Weiya Zhang
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-10

3.  Changes in proximal femoral mineral geometry precede the onset of radiographic hip osteoarthritis: The study of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  M K Javaid; N E Lane; D C Mackey; L-Y Lui; N K Arden; T J Beck; M C Hochberg; M C Nevitt
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2009-07

Review 4.  Tall stature.

Authors:  B S Alpert
Journal:  Pediatr Rev       Date:  1998-09

5.  The relationship of neck orientation to the shape of the proximal femur.

Authors:  J M Clark; M A Freeman; D Witham
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Radiographic case definitions and prevalence of osteoarthrosis of the hip: a survey of 4 151 subjects in the Osteoarthritis Substudy of the Copenhagen City Heart Study.

Authors:  Steffen Jacobsen; Stig Sonne-Holm; Kjeld Søballe; Peter Gebuhr; Bjarne Lund
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-12

7.  Proximal femur geometry to detect and distinguish femoral neck fractures from trochanteric fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  S Gnudi; C Ripamonti; L Lisi; M Fini; R Giardino; G Giavaresi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Morphology of the femur in proximal femoral fractures.

Authors:  B D Ferris; C Kennedy; M Bhamra; W Muirhead-Allwood
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-05

Review 9.  Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  G Lecerf; M H Fessy; R Philippot; P Massin; F Giraud; X Flecher; J Girard; P Mertl; E Marchetti; E Stindel
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 2.256

10.  The trochanteric double contour is a valuable landmark for assessing femoral offset underestimation on standard radiographs: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Stefan Blümel; Vincent A Stadelmann; Marco Brioschi; Alexander Küffer; Michael Leunig; Hannes A Rüdiger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.