Ran Zhao1, Hong Cai2, Hua Tian1, Ke Zhang1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, NO. 49 North Gardon Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, NO. 49 North Gardon Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China. yuzhibolingfeng@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The application of the anatomical parameters of the contralateral hip joint to guide the preoperative template of the affected side relies on the bilateral hip symmetry. We investigated the bilateral hip symmetry and range of anatomical variations by measurement and comparison of bilateral hip anatomical parameters. METHODS: This study included 224 patients (448 hips) who were diagnosed with osteoarthritis (OA) and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femur head, and underwent bilateral primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in our hospital from January 2012 to August 2020. Imaging data included 224 patients X-ray and 30 CT data at the end of the cohort. Anatomical parameters, including the acetabular abduction angle and trochanteric height, were measured using the Noble method. Postoperative measurements included stem size, difference of leg length and offset. RESULTS: Except for the isthmus width, there were no significant differences in the anatomical morphology of the hip joint. Among the demographic factors, there was a correlation between body weight and NSA. Among various anatomical parameters, a correlation was present between medullary cavity widths of T + 20, T, and T - 20. The difference in the use of stem size is not due to the morphological difference of bilateral medullary cavity, but due to the different of 1- or 2-stage surgery. CONCLUSION: Bilateral symmetry was present among the patients with normal morphology of the hip medullary cavity, theoretically confirming the feasibility of structural reconstruction of the hip joint using the hip joint on the uninjured side. Additionally, the difference in the morphology of the hip medullary cavity is not present in a single plane but is synergistically affected by multiple adjacent planes.
PURPOSE: The application of the anatomical parameters of the contralateral hip joint to guide the preoperative template of the affected side relies on the bilateral hip symmetry. We investigated the bilateral hip symmetry and range of anatomical variations by measurement and comparison of bilateral hip anatomical parameters. METHODS: This study included 224 patients (448 hips) who were diagnosed with osteoarthritis (OA) and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the femur head, and underwent bilateral primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) in our hospital from January 2012 to August 2020. Imaging data included 224 patients X-ray and 30 CT data at the end of the cohort. Anatomical parameters, including the acetabular abduction angle and trochanteric height, were measured using the Noble method. Postoperative measurements included stem size, difference of leg length and offset. RESULTS: Except for the isthmus width, there were no significant differences in the anatomical morphology of the hip joint. Among the demographic factors, there was a correlation between body weight and NSA. Among various anatomical parameters, a correlation was present between medullary cavity widths of T + 20, T, and T - 20. The difference in the use of stem size is not due to the morphological difference of bilateral medullary cavity, but due to the different of 1- or 2-stage surgery. CONCLUSION: Bilateral symmetry was present among the patients with normal morphology of the hip medullary cavity, theoretically confirming the feasibility of structural reconstruction of the hip joint using the hip joint on the uninjured side. Additionally, the difference in the morphology of the hip medullary cavity is not present in a single plane but is synergistically affected by multiple adjacent planes.
Authors: Matthieu Ollivier; Sebastien Parratte; Thomas Le Corroller; Thomas Lecorroller; Andrea Reggiori; Pierre Champsaur; Jean-Noël Argenson Journal: Surg Radiol Anat Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 1.246
Authors: Nick J Little; Constant A Busch; John A Gallagher; Cecil H Rorabeck; Robert B Bourne Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2009-05-02 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Marcel Betsch; Roman Michalik; Maximilian Graber; Michael Wild; Rüdiger Krauspe; Christoph Zilkens Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: P Savov; S Budde; S Tsamassiotis; H Windhagen; M Klintschar; M Ettinger Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 3.067