Literature DB >> 9921666

Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips.

B C Moore1, R W Peters, M A Stone.   

Abstract

People with cochlear hearing loss have markedly higher speech-receptions thresholds (SRTs) than normal for speech presented in background sounds with spectral and/or temporal dips. This article examines the extent to which SRTs can be improved by linear amplification with appropriate frequency-response shaping, and by fast-acting wide-dynamic-range compression amplification with one, two, four, or eight channels. Eighteen elderly subjects with moderate to severe hearing loss were tested. SRTs for sentences were measured for four background sounds, presented at a nominal level (prior to amplification) of 65 dB SPL: (1) A single female talker, digitally filtered so that the long-term average spectrum matched that of the target speech; (2) a noise with the same average spectrum as the target speech, but with the temporal envelope of the single talker; (3) a noise with the same overall spectral shape as the target speech, but filtered so as to have 4 equivalent-rectangular-bandwidth (ERB) wide spectral notches at several frequencies; (4) a noise with both spectral and temporal dips obtained by applying the temporal envelope of a single talker to speech-shaped noise [as in (2)] and then filtering that noise [as in (3)]. Mean SRTs were 5-6 dB lower (better) in all of the conditions with amplification than for unaided listening. SRTs were significantly lower for the systems with one-, four-, and eight-channel compression than for linear amplification, although the benefit, averaged across subjects, was typically only 0.5 to 0.9 dB. The lowest mean SRT (-9.9 dB, expressed as a speech-to-background ratio) was obtained for noise (4) and the system with eight-channel compression. This is about 6 dB worse than for elderly subjects with near-normal hearing, when tested without amplification. It is concluded that amplification, and especially fast-acting compression amplification, can improve the ability to understand speech in background sounds with spectral and temporal dips, but it does not restore performance to normal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9921666     DOI: 10.1121/1.424571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  25 in total

1.  Interrupted speech perception: the effects of hearing sensitivity and frequency resolution.

Authors:  Su-Hyun Jin; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  The choice of compression speed in hearing AIDS: theoretical and practical considerations and the role of individual differences.

Authors:  Brian C J Moore
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

3.  Effects of compression on speech acoustics, intelligibility, and sound quality.

Authors:  Pamela E Souza
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-12

4.  Behavioral measures of cochlear compression and temporal resolution as predictors of speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Melanie J Gregan; Peggy B Nelson; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Masking release for hearing-impaired listeners: The effect of increased audibility through reduction of amplitude variability.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Laura A D'Aquila
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Evolutionary conservation and neuronal mechanisms of auditory perceptual restoration.

Authors:  Christopher I Petkov; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Envelope coding in auditory nerve fibers following noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Sushrut Kale; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-06-16

8.  The role of the arcuate and middle longitudinal fasciculi in speech perception in noise in adulthood.

Authors:  Pascale Tremblay; Maxime Perron; Isabelle Deschamps; Dan Kennedy-Higgins; Jean-Christophe Houde; Anthony Steven Dick; Maxime Descoteaux
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.

Authors:  Evelyn Davies-Venn; Pamela Souza; Marc Brennan; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Consonant identification in noise using Hilbert-transform temporal fine-structure speech and recovered-envelope speech for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Agnès C Léger; Charlotte M Reed; Joseph G Desloge; Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Louis D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.