Literature DB >> 9917661

The Coventry Award. Modular tibial insert micromotion. A concern with contemporary knee implants.

N L Parks1, G A Engh, L D Topoleski, J Emperado.   

Abstract

This study investigates micromotion between modular tibial components, one of the causes of wear on the undersurface of polyethylene inserts. The authors measured motion at the interface of nine contemporary total knee implant designs by mechanically testing the implants in a servohydraulic testing machine. Anteroposterior and mediolateral motion between the tibial insert and baseplate were measured with an extensometer placed across the interface. These tests revealed that in all implants analyzed, sufficient motion occurred to create fretting at the modular interface. Although the testing configuration in this study was not a stimulation of in situ loading patterns, the authors observed hundreds of microns of motion even under a 100 N load and variability between implants of the same design, showing that there is room for improvement among locking mechanisms in modular total knee implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9917661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  24 in total

1.  Knee wear measured in retrievals: a polished tray reduces insert wear.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry; John H Currier; Michael B Mayor; John P Collier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Durability of a cruciate-retaining TKA with modular tibial trays at 20 years.

Authors:  John J Callaghan; Mitchell W Beckert; David W Hennessy; Devon D Goetz; Scott S Kelley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Pulsed lavage improves fixation strength of cemented tibial components.

Authors:  Ulf J Schlegel; Jan Siewe; Karl S Delank; Peer Eysel; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Anne Gebert de Uhlenbrock
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Finite element analysis: a comparison of an all-polyethylene tibial implant and its metal-backed equivalent.

Authors:  S M Thompson; D Yohuno; W N Bradley; A D Crocombe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  International multi-centre survivorship analysis of mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  James B Stiehl; Karel J Hamelynck; Paul E Voorhorst
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Highly crosslinked polyethylene is safe for use in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Hodrick; Erik P Severson; Deborah S McAlister; Brian Dahl; Aaron A Hofmann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Comparison among total knee arthroplasties with a mobile bearing: menisci versus rotating platform versus AP glide platform.

Authors:  Giuseppe Solarino; Andrea Luca; Luigi Marzo; Lorenzo Scialpi; Giovanni B Solarino
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2008-06-27

Review 8.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of fixed- versus mobile-bearing total knee replacement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Farshid Ejtehadi; Rachel Nichols; Leigh Davies; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Long-term outcome of low contact stress total knee arthroplasty with different mobile bearing designs.

Authors:  Giuseppe Solarino; Antonio Spinarelli; Massimiliano Carrozzo; Andrea Piazzolla; Giovanni Vicenti; Biagio Moretti
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-08-01

10.  Current Total Knee Designs: Does Baseplate Roughness or Locking Mechanism Design Affect Polyethylene Backside Wear?

Authors:  Zachary W Sisko; Matthew G Teeter; Brent A Lanting; James L Howard; Richard W McCalden; Douglas D Naudie; Steven J MacDonald; Edward M Vasarhelyi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.