Literature DB >> 25606553

Long-term outcome of low contact stress total knee arthroplasty with different mobile bearing designs.

Giuseppe Solarino1, Antonio Spinarelli1, Massimiliano Carrozzo1, Andrea Piazzolla1, Giovanni Vicenti1, Biagio Moretti1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: to evaluate the differences in clinical outcome and survivorship of three different mobile bearings for total knee arthroplasty.
METHODS: a retrospective study was conducted in 60 patients (53 females, 7 males, mean age: 68 years and 5 months) each submitted to total knee replacement using one of the three different mobile bearings of the LCS system (Depuy Johnson & Johnson, Warsaw, IN). The diagnosis was knee osteoarthritis in 57 cases and rheumatoid arthritis in three cases. Three different groups of 20 cases each were identified: total knee arthroplasties with mobile menisci (group 1); total knee arthroplasties with the rotating platform (group 2); and total knee arthroplasties with the anteroposterior glide platform (group 3). As regards the component fixation, 33 implants were cementless, three were cemented, and in 24 only the tibial component was cemented. The patella was not replaced.
RESULTS: although the duration of follow-up differed between the three groups, the clinical and radiological results at final follow-up showed no revision of femoral and/or tibial components for mechanical or septic reasons, and no signs of impending failure. One meniscal bearing, showing polyethylene wear after 17 years, was successfully replaced.
CONCLUSIONS: the present retrospective study confirmed the long-term effectiveness of knee implants with mobile bearings, in which the congruity of the surfaces makes it possible to overcome the problem of high contact stresses that may result in polyethylene wear and osteolysis; at the same time, these implants eliminate constraint forces thereby reducing the risk of mechanical loosening. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  knee arthroplasty; meniscal bearings; mobile bearing; rotating platform

Year:  2014        PMID: 25606553      PMCID: PMC4295681          DOI: 10.11138/jts/2014.2.3.109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Joints        ISSN: 2512-9090


  21 in total

1.  Twenty-year evaluation of meniscal bearing and rotating platform knee replacements.

Authors:  F F Buechel; F F Buechel; M J Pappas; J D'Alessio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  The causes of insert backside wear in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ray C Wasielewski
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Tibiofemoral contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing inlay designs.

Authors:  Christina Stukenborg-Colsman; Sven Ostermeier; Christof Hurschler; Carl Joachim Wirth
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2002-12

4.  Long-term survivorship analysis of cruciate-sparing versus cruciate-sacrificing knee prostheses using meniscal bearings.

Authors:  F F Buechel; M J Pappas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system.

Authors:  F C Ewald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  No clinical difference between fixed- and mobile-bearing cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  O Bailey; K Ferguson; E Crawfurd; P James; P A May; S Brown; M Blyth; W J Leach
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-02-09       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Cemented versus cementless fixation of a tibial component in LCS mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty performed by a single surgeon.

Authors:  Won-Sik Choy; Dae-Suk Yang; Kwang-Won Lee; Sang-Ki Lee; Kap-Jung Kim; Shann-Haw Chang
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Tibial insert undersurface as a contributing source of polyethylene wear debris.

Authors:  R C Wasielewski; N Parks; I Williams; H Surprenant; J P Collier; G Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different knee prostheses: the Knee Arthroplasty Trial (KAT).

Authors:  David W Murray; Graeme S MacLennan; Suzanne Breeman; Helen A Dakin; Linda Johnston; Marion K Campbell; Alastair M Gray; Nick Fiddian; Ray Fitzpatrick; Richard W Morris; Adrian M Grant
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  Adventures in mobile-bearing knee design: a mid-life crisis.

Authors:  J N Insall
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  5 in total

1.  Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties using PCL-retaining and PCL-substituting implants in the same patients.

Authors:  Yoshinori Ishii; Hideo Noguchi; Junko Sato; Tetsuya Sakurai; Shin-Ichi Toyabe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Ceramic Total Knee Arthroplasty: Ready to Go?

Authors:  G Solarino; C Piconi; V De Santis; A Piazzolla; B Moretti
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2017-10-26

3.  Temporal patterns of commonly used clinical outcome scales during a 5-year period after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Vivek Tiwari; Jonggeun Lee; Gaurav Sharma; Yeon Gwi Kang; Tae Kyun Kim
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2019-03-25

4.  Autologous bone marrow mesenchymal cell induced chondrogenesis for the treatment of osteoarthritis of knee.

Authors:  Sung Woo Huh; Asode Ananthram Shetty; Jang Mook Kim; Mi-La Cho; Seon Ae Kim; Siyoung Yang; Young Ju Kim; Palaksha Kanive Javaregowda; Nam Yong Choi; Jin Kang; Seok Jung Kim
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 4.169

5.  Functional outcomes comparative analysis of cemented and uncemented total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  V Yu Murylev; A V Muzychenkov; A G Zhuchkov; N A Tsygin; N V Rigin; P M Elizarov; G A Kukovenko
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-05-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.