Literature DB >> 22669547

Durability of a cruciate-retaining TKA with modular tibial trays at 20 years.

John J Callaghan1, Mitchell W Beckert, David W Hennessy, Devon D Goetz, Scott S Kelley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Modular tibial trays have been utilized in TKA for more than 20 years. However, concerns have been raised about modular implants and it is unclear whether these devices are durable in the long term. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined (1) survival, (2) relationship of age and polyethylene thickness with revision, (3) function, and (4) radiographic lucencies and osteolysis in patients having a single TKA implant at 20-year followup.
METHODS: We prospectively followed 75 patients implanted with 101 Press-Fit Condylar(®) (Johnson and Johnson Professional, Inc, Raynham, MA, USA) posterior cruciate-retaining TKAs (with modular tibial trays) between 1988 and 1991. At 20 years, 59 patients were deceased. We clinically evaluated the living 16 patients (22 knees) and contacted the relatives of all deceased patients to confirm implant status. We clinically assessed 14 of the 16 patients with the Knee Society score, WOMAC, and UCLA and Tegner activity level scores. Radiographically, we determined lucencies, component migration, and osteolysis. We performed survival analysis including all original patients. Minimum followup was 20 years (mean, 20.6 years; range, 20-21.8 years).
RESULTS: Six reoperations were performed in five patients (6% rate of revision) over the 20-year followup. All revisions were related to polyethylene wear and occurred at least 10 years after the primary procedure. Survivorship with revision for any reason as the end point was 91% (95% CI, 0.83-0.97) at 20 years. Average Knee Society clinical and functional scores were 90 (range, 60-100) and 59 (range, 30-87), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate the durability of this posterior cruciate-retaining TKA design. The data provide a standard for newer designs and newer bearing surface materials at comparable followup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22669547      PMCID: PMC3528919          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2401-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  37 in total

1.  Linear and volumetric wear of tibial inserts in posterior cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasties.

Authors:  J Benjamin; J Szivek; G Dersam; S Persselin; R Johnson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  In vivo deterioration of tibial baseplate locking mechanisms in contemporary modular total knee components.

Authors:  G A Engh; S Lounici; A R Rao; M B Collier
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Total condylar knee arthroplasty. 16- to 21-year results.

Authors:  G S Gill; A B Joshi; D M Mills
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The effectiveness of isolated tibial insert exchange in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  George C Babis; Robert T Trousdale; Bernard F Morrey
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Long-term followup after mobile-bearing total knee replacement.

Authors:  Frederick F Buechel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Total knee arthroplasty using cruciate-retaining kinematic condylar prosthesis.

Authors:  G S Sextro; D J Berry; J A Rand
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Total condylar knee replacement: a 20-year followup study.

Authors:  J A Rodriguez; H Bhende; C S Ranawat
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Total condylar knee arthroplasty: a long-term followup.

Authors:  V Pavone; F Boettner; S Fickert; T P Sculco
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Long-term results of Kinematic Condylar knee replacement. An analysis of 404 knees.

Authors:  G S Gill; A B Joshi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2001-04

10.  Kinematic condylar total knee arthroplasty. 14-year survivorship analysis of 208 consecutive cases.

Authors:  D J Weir; C G Moran; I M Pinder
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1996-11
View more
  10 in total

1.  Does a non-stemmed constrained condylar prosthesis predispose to early failure of primary total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ajit J Deshmukh; Parthiv A Rathod; Michael J Moses; Nimrod Snir; Scott E Marwin; Alan J Dayan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  CORR Insights®: How do knee implants perform past the second decade? Nineteen- to 25-year followup of the Press-fit Condylar design TKA.

Authors:  Ville Remes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Iranian Joint Registry (Iranian National Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registry).

Authors:  Hamidreza Aslani; Seyed Taghi Nourbakhsh; Farivar A Lahiji; Keykavoos Heydarian; Mahmood Jabalameli; Mohammad Taghi Ghazavi; Mohammad Naghi Tahmasebi; Mahmoud Reza Fayyaz; Mohammad Ali Sazegari; Maziar Mohaddes; Mojtaba Rajabpour; Mohammad Emami; Seyyed Mohammad Jazayeri; Firooz Madadi; Hossein Farahini; Fardin Mirzatoloee; Mohammad Gharahdaghi; Mohammad Hossein Ebrahimzadeh; Mohammadreza Ebrahimian; Hossein Mirvakili; Kaveh Bashti; Mohtasham Almasizadeh; Mansour Abolghasemian; Afshin Taheriazam; Mehdi Motififard; Hamidreza Yazdi; Mahmood Karimi Mobarakeh; Masoud Shayestehazar; Mehdi Moghtadae; Babak Siavashi; Mohammadreza M Sajjadi; Alireza Manafi Rasi; Seyyed Kazem Chabok; Zohreh Zafarani; Shahin Salehi; Monireh Ahmadi; Amin Mohammadi; Mohammad Ebrahim Shahsavand
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2016-04

4.  Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties using PCL-retaining and PCL-substituting implants in the same patients.

Authors:  Yoshinori Ishii; Hideo Noguchi; Junko Sato; Tetsuya Sakurai; Shin-Ichi Toyabe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  How do knee implants perform past the second decade? Nineteen- to 25-year followup of the Press-fit Condylar design TKA.

Authors:  Shantanu Patil; Julie C McCauley; Pamela Pulido; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  What can be learned from minimum 20-year followup studies of knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  John J Callaghan; Christopher T Martin; Yubo Gao; Andrew J Pugely; Steve S Liu; Devon D Goetz; Scott S Kelley; Richard C Johnston
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Impact of change of knee prosthesis on early clinical outcomes in a large volume arthroplasty centre.

Authors:  P Moonot; O D'Mello; N Tzinga; K Sisak; N J Fiddian; A H Harvey
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.951

8.  How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Jonathan T Evans; Robert W Walker; Jonathan P Evans; Ashley W Blom; Adrian Sayers; Michael R Whitehouse
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Unacceptable failure rate of a ceramic-coated posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  David Lionberger; Christopher Conlon; Laura Wattenbarger; Timothy J Walker
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-03-22

10.  Blood Metal Ion Release After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Tobias Reiner; Reza Sorbi; Maike Müller; Timo Nees; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Markus Rickert; Babak Moradi
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.071

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.