Literature DB >> 9895071

Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults.

P S Myles1, J O Hunt, C E Nightingale, H Fletcher, T Beh, D Tanil, A Nagy, A Rubinstein, J L Ponsford.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A variety of methods have been used to quantify aspects of recovery after anesthesia. Most are narrowly focused, are not patient-rated, and have not been validated. We therefore set out to develop a patient-rated quality of recovery score. We constructed a 61-item questionnaire that asked individuals (patients and relatives, medical and nursing staff; total n = 136) to rate various postoperative items describing features a patient may experience postoperatively. The most highly ranked items were included in a final nine-point index score, which we called the "QoR Score." We then studied two cohorts of surgical patients (n = 449). There was good convergent validity between the QoR Score and the visual analog scale score (rho = 0.55, P < 0.0001). Discriminant construct validity was supported by comparing resultant QoR Scores in patients undergoing day-stay, minor, and major surgery (P = 0.008), as well as a negative correlation with duration of hospital stay (rho = -0.20, P < 0.0001), and, using multivariate regression, demonstrating a significant negative relationship between QoR Score and female gender (P = 0.048) and older age (P = 0.041). There was also good interrater agreement (rho = 0.55, P < 0.0001), test-retest reliability (median rho = 0.61, P < 0.0001), and internal consistency (alpha = 0.57 and 0.90, P < 0.0001). There was a significant difference between the groups of patients recovering from major and minor surgery (P < 0.001). This study demonstrates that the QoR Score has good validity, reliability, and clinical acceptability in patients undergoing many types of surgery. IMPLICATIONS: We set out to develop a patient-rated quality of recovery score (QoR) that could be used both as a measure of outcome in perioperative trials and for clinical audit. We first surveyed patients and staff to identify important aspects of recovery, then developed a nine-point QoR Score. This was then compared with other measures of postoperative outcome. We found that the QoR Score is a useful measure of recovery after anesthesia and surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9895071     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199901000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  68 in total

1.  Sex differences in speed of emergence and quality of recovery after anaesthesia: cohort study.

Authors:  P S Myles; A D McLeod; J O Hunt; H Fletcher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-24

2.  Validation of the Chinese Version of the Quality of Recovery-15 Score and Its Comparison with the Post-Operative Quality Recovery Scale.

Authors:  Xue-Shan Bu; Jing Zhang; Yun-Xia Zuo
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Validity of the I-FEED score for postoperative gastrointestinal function in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Nourah Alsharqawi; Mohsen Alhashemi; Pepa Kaneva; Gabriele Baldini; Julio F Fiore; Liane S Feldman; Lawrence Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  'I felt weird and wobbly.' Child-reported impacts associated with a dental general anaesthetic.

Authors:  H Rodd; M Hall; C Deery; F Gilchrist; B J Gibson; Z Marshman
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.626

5.  How well are we measuring postoperative "recovery" after abdominal surgery?

Authors:  Lawrence Lee; Teodora Dumitra; Julio F Fiore; Nancy E Mayo; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale: a first pilot study.

Authors:  Yusuke Naito; Yuu Tanaka; Noriyuki Sasaoka; Toshio Iwata; Yuko Fujimoto; Nozomi Okamoto; Satoki Inoue; Masahiko Kawaguchi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  Use of quality of recovery score (QoR40) in the assessment of postoperative recovery and evaluation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols.

Authors:  Yuu Tanaka; Atushi Yoshimura; Kyoko Tagawa; Dai Shida; Masahiko Kawaguchi
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  The Effects of Intravenous Lidocaine Infusions on the Quality of Recovery and Chronic Pain After Robotic Thyroidectomy: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Study.

Authors:  Kwan Woong Choi; Kee-Hyun Nam; Jeong-Rim Lee; Woong Youn Chung; Sang-Wook Kang; Young Eun Joe; Jae Hoon Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Meaningful outcome measures in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Paul S Myles
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2014-03

10.  Normal Saline Solution and Lactated Ringer's Solution Have a Similar Effect on Quality of Recovery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Andrew Friederich; Natalie Martin; Morgan B Swanson; Brett A Faine; Nicholas M Mohr
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 5.721

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.