Lawrence Lee1, Teodora Dumitra2, Julio F Fiore2,3, Nancy E Mayo3, Liane S Feldman2. 1. Department of Surgery, Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Ave, E19-125, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada. larry.lee@mail.mcgill.ca. 2. Department of Surgery, Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Ave, E19-125, Montreal, QC, H3G 1A4, Canada. 3. Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The content validity of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) commonly used to measure postoperative recovery is unknown. The objective of this study was to develop a conceptual framework for recovery after abdominal surgery and to analyze the content of PRO instruments against this conceptual framework. METHODS: Qualitative methods were used to develop a conceptual framework for recovery. Patients undergoing abdominal surgery and healthcare professionals were interviewed. Recovery-related concepts were identified using a thematic analysis, and concepts were then linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The contents of eight PRO instruments that have been used to measure recovery were then examined using this conceptual framework. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients and 15 healthcare professionals were interviewed. A total of 22 important recovery-related concepts were identified and linked to the ICF. The four most important concepts were "Energy level," "Sensation of pain," "General physical endurance," and "Carrying out daily routine." The number of important recovery-related concepts covered by each instrument ranged from 1 to 22 (mean 7.3 concepts). The SF36 (n = 22), European Organization for the Treatment and Research of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-C30 (n = 20), and the Gastrointestinal Quality-of-Life Index (n = 19) covered the greatest number of important recovery concepts. No instrument covered all of the important concepts. CONCLUSIONS: The comparison of the contents of PRO instruments commonly used to measure postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery demonstrated major gaps in the representation of concepts that are important to patients and healthcare professionals.
PURPOSE: The content validity of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) commonly used to measure postoperative recovery is unknown. The objective of this study was to develop a conceptual framework for recovery after abdominal surgery and to analyze the content of PRO instruments against this conceptual framework. METHODS: Qualitative methods were used to develop a conceptual framework for recovery. Patients undergoing abdominal surgery and healthcare professionals were interviewed. Recovery-related concepts were identified using a thematic analysis, and concepts were then linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The contents of eight PRO instruments that have been used to measure recovery were then examined using this conceptual framework. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients and 15 healthcare professionals were interviewed. A total of 22 important recovery-related concepts were identified and linked to the ICF. The four most important concepts were "Energy level," "Sensation of pain," "General physical endurance," and "Carrying out daily routine." The number of important recovery-related concepts covered by each instrument ranged from 1 to 22 (mean 7.3 concepts). The SF36 (n = 22), European Organization for the Treatment and Research of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-C30 (n = 20), and the Gastrointestinal Quality-of-Life Index (n = 19) covered the greatest number of important recovery concepts. No instrument covered all of the important concepts. CONCLUSIONS: The comparison of the contents of PRO instruments commonly used to measure postoperative recovery after abdominal surgery demonstrated major gaps in the representation of concepts that are important to patients and healthcare professionals.
Entities:
Keywords:
Content validity; Function; ICF; Quality of life; Recovery
Authors: Kirsten B Kluivers; Ingrid Riphagen; Mark E Vierhout; Hans A M Brölmann; Henrica C W de Vet Journal: Surgery Date: 2007-12-21 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Lawrence Lee; Nathaniel Elfassy; Chao Li; Eric Latimer; A Sender Liberman; Patrick Charlebois; Barry Stein; Franco Carli; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: N K Aaronson; S Ahmedzai; B Bergman; M Bullinger; A Cull; N J Duez; A Filiberti; H Flechtner; S B Fleishman; J C de Haes Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1993-03-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Margaret Rothman; Laurie Burke; Pennifer Erickson; Nancy Kline Leidy; Donald L Patrick; Charles D Petrie Journal: Value Health Date: 2009-09-25 Impact factor: 5.725
Authors: John R Romanelli; Pascal R Fuchshuber; Jonah James Stulberg; Rebecca Brewer Kowalski; Prashant Sinha; Thomas A Aloia; Rocco Orlando Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-06-03 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: F Al Rashid; A S Liberman; P Charlebois; B Stein; L S Feldman; J F Fiore; L Lee Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 3.699
Authors: Nicolò Pecorelli; Saba Balvardi; A Sender Liberman; Patrick Charlebois; Barry Stein; Franco Carli; Liane S Feldman; Julio F Fiore Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Mohsen Alhashemi; Mohammed Almahroos; Julio F Fiore; Pepa Kaneva; Juan Mata Gutierrez; Amy Neville; Melina C Vassiliou; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Martin S Angst; Gabriela K Fragiadakis; Brice Gaudillière; Nima Aghaeepour; Garry P Nolan Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Roshni Alam; Sabrina M Figueiredo; Saba Balvardi; Bénédicte Nauche; Tara Landry; Lawrence Lee; Nancy E Mayo; Liane S Feldman; Julio F Fiore Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Marius Schwab; Niall Brindl; Alexander Studier-Fischer; Thomas Tu; Julia Gsenger; Max Pilgrim; Mirco Friedrich; Pia-Elena Frey; Christina Achilles; Alexander Leuck; Thore Bürgel; Manuel Feisst; Christina Klose; Solveig Tenckhoff; Colette Dörr-Harim; André L Mihaljevic Journal: Trials Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 2.279