Literature DB >> 25384894

Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale: a first pilot study.

Yusuke Naito1, Yuu Tanaka2, Noriyuki Sasaoka3, Toshio Iwata3, Yuko Fujimoto3, Nozomi Okamoto4, Satoki Inoue2, Masahiko Kawaguchi2.   

Abstract

The Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS) is a multi-domain tracking scale to assess recovery after surgery. The PQRS is used in seven countries and five languages; however, the Japanese version of the PQRS (PQRSj) has not been established. We therefore translated the PQRS into Japanese, and examined the feasibility, reliability and validity of the PQRSj. The time taken to complete the test was measured to assess feasibility. Cronbach's alpha was calculated to assess reliability. The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Japanese version of the Quality of Recovery Scale 40 (QoR-40 J) were performed for comparison with the PQRSj (validity). Fifty-one patients were enrolled in the study. The mean completion time was 3.9 min for baseline (feasibility). Cronbach's alpha was between 0.40 and 0.94 in each domain (reliability). A relationship was shown between cognitive domain and MMSE at baseline (r = 0.65, P < 0.01); however, no relationship was found between the other domains and the MMSE and QoR-40 J. Ceiling effects were observed in 78% of the questions. These results indicate that the PQRSj can be used to assess recovery after surgery, although it may be better to revise some of the questions to improve the validity of the PQRSj.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25384894     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-014-1945-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  12 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures.

Authors:  D E Beaton; C Bombardier; F Guillemin; M B Ferraz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults.

Authors:  P S Myles; J O Hunt; C E Nightingale; H Fletcher; T Beh; D Tanil; A Nagy; A Rubinstein; J L Ponsford
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40.

Authors:  Yuu Tanaka; Takafumi Wakita; Shunichi Fukuhara; Makoto Nishiwada; Satoki Inoue; Masahiko Kawaguchi; Hitoshi Furuya
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Development and feasibility of a scale to assess postoperative recovery: the post-operative quality recovery scale.

Authors:  Colin F Royse; Stanton Newman; Frances Chung; Jan Stygall; Rachel E McKay; Joachim Boldt; Frederique S Servin; Ignacio Hurtado; Raafat Hannallah; Buwei Yu; David J Wilkinson
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Symptom distress and functional status changes during the first seven days after ambulatory surgery.

Authors:  B A Swan; G Maislin; K B Traber
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Assessing a tool to measure patient functional ability after outpatient surgery.

Authors:  S L Hogue; P R Reese; M Colopy; L A Fleisher; K J Tuman; R S Twersky; D S Warner; B Jamerson
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 8.  A systematic review of postoperative recovery outcomes measurements after ambulatory surgery.

Authors:  Francisco J Herrera; Jean Wong; Frances Chung
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  The Surgical Recovery Index.

Authors:  M A Talamini; C L Stanfield; D C Chang; A W Wu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures.

Authors:  Andrew Garratt; Louise Schmidt; Anne Mackintosh; Ray Fitzpatrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-15
View more
  2 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale test and re-test in Swedish among healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Pether Jildenstål; Johan Eriksson; Margareta Warren Stomberg; Jan G Jakobsson
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-10-21

2.  The validation of a Japanese language version of the postoperative quality of recovery scale: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Koki Yamashita; Stuart Boggett; Yoshifumi Kodama; Isao Tsuneyoshi; Colin Royse
Journal:  JA Clin Rep       Date:  2021-04-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.