Literature DB >> 30146446

Normal Saline Solution and Lactated Ringer's Solution Have a Similar Effect on Quality of Recovery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Andrew Friederich1, Natalie Martin1, Morgan B Swanson1, Brett A Faine2, Nicholas M Mohr3.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis that balanced crystalloids improve quality of recovery more than normal saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride) in stable emergency department (ED) patients. Secondary outcomes measured differences in health care use.
METHODS: A single-site, participant- and evaluator-blinded, 2-arm parallel allocation (1:1), comparative effectiveness, randomized controlled trial allocated adults receiving intravenous fluids in the ED before discharge to receive 2 L of lactated Ringer's solution or normal saline solution. The primary outcome was symptom scores measured by the validated Quality of Recovery-40 instrument (scores 40 to 200) 24 hours after enrollment. Secondary outcomes included subsequent health care use and medication compliance.
RESULTS: Participants (N=157) were enrolled and follow-up was analyzed for 94 (follow-up rate of 60%) with intention-to-treat methodology. There was no difference in postenrollment Quality of Recovery-40 scores between normal saline solution and lactated Ringer's solution groups (mean difference 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] -6.8 to 11.6). Although preenrollment scores were higher in the lactated Ringer's solution group (mean difference 10.5; 95% CI 1.9 to 19.0), adjusting for presurvey imbalances did not change the primary outcome (adjusted difference -3.9; 95% CI -12.9 to 5.2). There were no differences in return to ED (mean difference 7.5%; 95% CI -8.7% to 23.8%), prescriptions filled (mean difference 22.2%; 95% CI -3.3% to 47.6%), or seeking care from another provider (mean difference -2.0%; 95% CI -19.9% to 15.9%) at 7 days.
CONCLUSION: Normal saline solution and lactated Ringer's solution were associated with similar 24-hour recovery scores and 7-day health care use in stable ED patients. These results supplement those of recent trials by informing fluid choice for stable ED patients.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30146446      PMCID: PMC6340785          DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  20 in total

1.  CONSORT revised--improving the reporting of randomized trials.

Authors:  D Rennie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Resuscitation fluids.

Authors:  John A Myburgh; Michael G Mythen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Saline Shortages - Many Causes, No Simple Solution.

Authors:  Maryann Mazer-Amirshahi; Erin R Fox
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Intravenous Fluids and Acute Kidney Injury.

Authors:  Xiaoqiang Ding; Zhen Cheng; Qi Qian
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.614

5.  Association between a chloride-liberal vs chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults.

Authors:  Nor'azim Mohd Yunos; Rinaldo Bellomo; Colin Hegarty; David Story; Lisa Ho; Michael Bailey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Noncritically Ill Adults.

Authors:  Wesley H Self; Matthew W Semler; Jonathan P Wanderer; Li Wang; Daniel W Byrne; Sean P Collins; Corey M Slovis; Christopher J Lindsell; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Edward D Siew; Andrew D Shaw; Gordon R Bernard; Todd W Rice
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  The history of 0.9% saline.

Authors:  Sherif Awad; Simon P Allison; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 7.324

8.  A randomized, controlled, double-blind crossover study on the effects of 2-L infusions of 0.9% saline and plasma-lyte® 148 on renal blood flow velocity and renal cortical tissue perfusion in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Abeed H Chowdhury; Eleanor F Cox; Susan T Francis; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Comparisons of normal saline and lactated Ringer's resuscitation on hemodynamics, metabolic responses, and coagulation in pigs after severe hemorrhagic shock.

Authors:  Wenjun Z Martini; Douglas S Cortez; Michael A Dubick
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 10.  Science review: extracellular acidosis and the immune response: clinical and physiologic implications.

Authors:  John A Kellum; Mingchen Song; Jinyou Li
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  3 in total

1.  Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill patients: The PRISMA study of a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuhan Zhu; Nan Guo; Maifen Song; Fei Xia; Yanqing Wu; Xusheng Wang; Tengfei Chen; Zhihai Yang; Siwen Yang; Yu Zhang; Xin Zhang; Qingquan Shi; Xiaoxu Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Buffered solutions versus 0.9% saline for resuscitation in critically ill adults and children.

Authors:  Alba M Antequera Martín; Jesus A Barea Mendoza; Alfonso Muriel; Ignacio Sáez; Mario Chico-Fernández; José M Estrada-Lorenzo; Maria N Plana
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-19

3.  Acute kidney injury and continuous renal replacement therapy in children; what pediatricians need to know.

Authors:  Myung Hyun Cho; Hee Gyung Kang
Journal:  Korean J Pediatr       Date:  2018-10-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.