Literature DB >> 9894689

Precision hypothesis and the end-state comfort effect.

M W Short1, J H Cauraugh.   

Abstract

Recently, motor control research has emphasized the planning of macroscopic aspects of control. In object manipulation studies, when participants complete a movement in a comfortable posture, an end-state comfort effect is attained. One explanation for this effect is the precision hypothesis, which states that precision increases when participants are in a comfortable position. This research directly tests the precision hypothesis in two experiments. In Experiment 1, participants picked up a dowel and touched a large or small target on a wall. For the second experiment, the same procedure was followed using a pinpoint target. The probability analyses of the first experiment indicated that the end-state comfort effect was magnified in the small target condition and that the point-of-change effect (Short and Cauraugh, 1997) appeared only when end-state comfort was magnified. Error analyses in Experiment 2 showed that participants were more accurate when in a more comfortable position. The present findings indicate that the precision hypothesis plays a significant role in the end-state comfort effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9894689     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(98)00020-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  22 in total

1.  Anticipatory planning deficits and task context effects in hemiparetic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Marcel Mutsaarts; Bert Steenbergen; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The continuous end-state comfort effect: weighted integration of multiple biases.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-04-17

3.  Habitual and goal-directed factors in (everyday) object handling.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Cognition, action, and object manipulation.

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum; Kate M Chapman; Matthias Weigelt; Daniel J Weiss; Robrecht van der Wel
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 17.737

5.  The contribution of cognitive, kinematic, and dynamic factors to anticipatory grasp selection.

Authors:  Oliver Herbort; Martin V Butz; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Physically coupling two objects in a bimanual task alters kinematics but not end-state comfort.

Authors:  Charmayne M L Hughes; Jeffrey M Haddad; Elizabeth A Franz; Howard N Zelaznik; Joong Hyun Ryu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Anticipatory planning of functional reach-to-grasp: a pilot study.

Authors:  Caroline Tan; Jarugool Tretriluxana; Erica Pitsch; Nuttakarn Runnarong; Carolee J Winstein
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Comparative investigations of manual action representations: evidence that chimpanzees represent the costs of potential future actions involving tools.

Authors:  Scott H Frey; Daniel J Povinelli
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans.

Authors:  Rajal G Cohen; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.