Literature DB >> 9889800

Laparoscopy in 533 patients with abdominal malignancy.

D B Pearlstone1, P F Mansfield, S A Curley, M Kumparatana, P Cook, B W Feig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy in patients with intra-abdominal malignancy remains controversial. This study evaluates the incidence of tumor recurrence at the port site after laparoscopy in patients with intra-abdominal malignancy.
METHODS: The medical records of all patients with nongynecologic malignancies who underwent laparoscopic procedures between May 1, 1990, and June 30, 1996, at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center were reviewed. Data on extent of tumor, histologic findings, primary location, procedures performed, and complications were recorded.
RESULTS: During this time, 533 patients with known intra-abdominal malignancies underwent laparoscopy. Mean follow-up time was 13.2 +/- 0.5 months (range 1 to 71 months; median 10.6 months). Four recurrences at the port site were identified (0.8%). Three of these patients had advanced intra-abdominal disease at the time of laparoscopy; 1 patient without advanced disease at the time of laparoscopy had a recurrence at the port site as the only site of recurrent disease (0.19%). The incidence of port site recurrences among patients with advanced intra-abdominal disease at the time of laparoscopy (3/71) was significantly greater than the risk of development of a recurrence at the port site among patients without advanced intra-abdominal disease at the time of laparoscopy (1/462; P < .0003, by chi-square analysis).
CONCLUSION: Recurrence at the port site is very rare. When implantation at the port site does occur, it is most commonly associated with advanced intra-abdominal disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9889800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  8 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Andrea Vignali; Luca Gianotti; Walter Zuliani; Giovanni Radaelli; Paola Gruarin; Paolo Dellabona; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Port-site recurrence in a patient undergoing robot-assisted gynecologic cancer surgery for endometrial cancer - A case report.

Authors:  Shakina Rauff; Joseph S Ng
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Case Rep       Date:  2012-08-07

Review 3.  The net immunologic advantage of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Y W Novitsky; D E M Litwin; M P Callery
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Technique and survival after laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy.

Authors:  I Baća; Z Perko; I Bokan; Z Mimica; A Petricević; N Druzijanić; M Situm
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic resection for colorectal diseases: short-term outcomes of a single center.

Authors:  Wafi Attaallah; Hayyam Babayev; Samet Yardımcı; Asım Cingi; Mustafa Ümit Uğurlu; Ömer Günal
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2016-04-06

Review 6.  Core value of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Xin-Xiang Li; Ren-Jie Wang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-12-10

7.  Port-site recurrence reproduced in the VX-2 rabbit carcinoma model: an in vivo model comparing laparoscopic port sites and open incisions.

Authors:  N W Wilkinson; A J Shapiro; S B Harvey; R S Stack; R L Cornum
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Photodynamic diagnosis of peritoneal metastasis in human pancreatic cancer using 5-aminolevulinic acid during staging laparoscopy.

Authors:  Kyoichi Harada; Yasutoshi Murayama; Hidemasa Kubo; Hisataka Matsuo; Ryo Morimura; Hisashi Ikoma; Hitoshi Fujiwara; Kazuma Okamoto; Tohru Tanaka; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 2.967

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.