Literature DB >> 15791361

The net immunologic advantage of laparoscopic surgery.

Y W Novitsky1, D E M Litwin, M P Callery.   

Abstract

The trauma of surgery evokes a variety of physiologic and immunologic alterations that should contribute to host defense. However, an exaggerated response to injury may result in immunosuppression and lead to significant postoperative morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic surgery may result in less induced surgical trauma than conventional open surgery. Decreased postoperative pain and speedy functional recovery of laparoscopic patients may be attributable to the reduced inflammatory response and minimal immunosuppression. Inflammation, an early protective homeostatic immune response to injury, is characterized by the production of proinflammatory cytokines and by activation of cellular and humoral immune mechanisms. Postoperative levels of the inflammatory cytokines have been consistently lower after laparoscopic procedures, indicating a smaller degree of surgical insult and acute inflammatory reaction. Surgical stress derails the functions of both polymorphonuclear and mononuclear cells, which may lead to an increased risk of postoperative infection. Comparative studies of cellular immunity after laparoscopic and conventional surgery demonstrate immunologic advantage conferred by laparoscopy. Exaggerated activation of peritoneal immunity may lead to a relative local immunosuppression, resulting in ineffective intraperitoneal bacterial clearance and serious postoperative infections. Functions of the peritoneal macrophages are better preserved when laparotomy is avoided. Decreased perioperative stress may be particularly important for oncologic patients. Laparoscopic approaches may result in diminished perioperative tumor dissemination and better cancer outcomes. Although laparoscopy is "minimally invasive," systemic immune responses still are undeniably activated. However, laparoscopic surgery appears to induce a smaller injury, resulting in proportionally decreased immunologic changes. In addition to improved cosmesis and faster functional recovery, a patient undergoing laparoscopic surgery may benefit most from a net immunologic advantage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15791361     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8275-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  89 in total

1.  A prospective randomized study of the systemic immune response after laparoscopic and conventional Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  C Sietses; M J Wiezer; Q A Eijsbouts; R H Beelen; P A van Leeuwen; B M von Blomberg; S Meijer; M A Cuesta
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Host response to laparoscopic surgery: mechanisms and clinical correlates.

Authors:  D J Hackam; O D Rotstein
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Local regional promotion of tumor growth after abdominal surgery is dominant over immunotherapy with interleukin-2 and lymphokine activated killer cells.

Authors:  A M Eggermont; E P Steller; R L Marquet; J Jeekel; P H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1988

4.  Comparison of serum C-reactive protein concentrations for laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Halevy; G Lin; R Gold-Deutsch; R Lavi; M Negri; S Evans; D Cotariu; J M Sackier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Peritoneal macrophage and blood monocyte functions after open and laparoscopic-assisted cecectomy in rats.

Authors:  S W Lee; D L Feingold; J J Carter; C Zhai; G Stapleton; N Gleason; R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Regulation of macrophage TNF alpha, IL-1 beta, and Ia (I-A alpha) mRNA expression during peritonitis is site dependent.

Authors:  K M McMasters; W G Cheadle
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  Metabolic and inflammatory responses after open or laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M S Jakeways; V Mitchell; I A Hashim; S J Chadwick; A Shenkin; C J Green; F Carli
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Oncological quality and preliminary long-term results in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  H Scheidbach; C Schneider; O Hügel; H Scheuerlein; E Bärlehner; J Konradt; C Wittekind; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy.

Authors:  S D Wexner; S M Cohen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Hypoxia/reoxygenation affects endotoxin tolerance.

Authors:  G Arya; V F Garcia
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.192

View more
  69 in total

1.  Comparison of inflammatory stress response between laparoscopic and open approach for pediatric inguinal hernia repair in children.

Authors:  Miro Jukić; Zenon Pogorelić; Daniela Šupe-Domić; Ana Jerončić
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Evaluation of the clinical and inflammatory responses in exclusively NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic routes: an experimental study in swine.

Authors:  Josiel P Vieira; Marcelo M Linhares; Elesiário M Caetano; Rita M A Moura; Vitor Asseituno; Rogério Fuzyi; Manoel J B Girão; José M Ruano; Alberto Goldenberg; Gaspar de Jesus L Filho; Délcio Matos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Changes in T-lymphocytes' viability after laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Ilias P Gomatos; Leonidas Alevizos; Olga Kalathaki; Harilaos Kantsos; Agapi Kataki; Emmanuel Leandros; George Zografos; Manousos Konstantoulakis
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-04

4.  Early immune outcome of retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Yang Lu; Fan Tianyong; Wei Qiang; Cui Xiaobo; Bu Siyuan; Han Ping
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Laparotomy versus retroperitoneal laparoscopy in debridement and drainage of retroperitoneal infected necrosis in severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Yuliang Tu; Huabo Jiao; Xianglong Tan; Liyuan Sun; Wenzhi Zhang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Peritoneal damage: the inflammatory response and clinical implications of the neuro-immuno-humoral axis.

Authors:  Tarik Sammour; Arman Kahokehr; Mattias Soop; Andrew G Hill
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  A Comparison of Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery for Hepatic and Pancreatic Resections Among the Medicare Population.

Authors:  Qinyu Chen; Katiuscha Merath; Fabio Bagante; Ozgur Akgul; Mary Dillhoff; Jordan Cloyd; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Perioperative inflammatory response in natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Ion Georgescu; Adrian Saftoiu; Stefan Patrascu; Isabela Silosi; Eugen Georgescu; Valeriu Surlin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Short-term follow-up after laparoscopic versus conventional total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer in a large teaching hospital.

Authors:  A H W Schiphorst; A Doeksen; M E Hamaker; D D E Zimmerman; A Pronk
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Thoracoscopic repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in infancy.

Authors:  Oliver B Lao; Matthew R Crouthamel; Adam B Goldin; Robert S Sawin; John H T Waldhausen; Stephen S Kim
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.878

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.