Literature DB >> 15776206

Technique and survival after laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy.

I Baća1, Z Perko, I Bokan, Z Mimica, A Petricević, N Druzijanić, M Situm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopic colon resection in the management of colon cancer is still controversial. In this article, the surgical strategy and techniques are described, with further consideration of the oncologically relevant aspects.
METHODS: Between March 1993 and July 2003, we performed laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in 56 patients with right colon carcinoma. Average age was 74.5 years (range, 17-92). We performed a standardized surgical procedure that included mobilization from the vascularized mesenteric bridges with a window technique, transection of the ileocolic lymphovascular pedicle, and lateral and proximal mobilization of the ileocecum, ascending colon, right flexure, and proximale transversum. After enlargement of one of the trocar incisions the exteriorized colon was resected and an extracorporeal anastomosis was performed in the standard manner.
RESULTS: There were no conversions to open. The mean operating time was 119 +/- 38 min, the mean length of resected colon was 27.8 +/- 4.48 cm, and the average width of the clear margins was 6.8 +/- 5.3 cm. One patient died. Lymph nodes were positive in 21 patients. The 5-year survival rate in the 48 patients who were operated on with curative intent was 75%. We have had two local recurrences. The overall 5-year mortality-free fraction was 63%. Cox multivariate analysis showed that the mortality-prognostic factors were tumor stage and length of resected colon, whereas Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the mortality-prognostic factors were positive lymph nodes and tumor stage.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer can be performed safely. Complications and recurrence rates are comparable to those for left-sided laparoscopic and open procedures. Therefore, we recommend this procedure as the method of choice. Laparoscopically treated patients with stage II and stage III disease have almost the same cumulative rate of survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15776206     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-9068-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  32 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy.

Authors:  E Lezoche; F Feliciotti; M Guerrieri; A M Paganini; A De Sanctis; R Campagnacci; G D'Ambrosio
Journal:  Minerva Chir       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Laparoscopy-assisted colorectal surgery. Early outcome in benign and malignant diseases--a prospective study of 120 patients].

Authors:  I Baca; C Schultz; V Götzen; L Grzybowski
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 0.942

Review 3.  Laparoscopic surgery and the systemic immune response.

Authors:  F J Vittimberga; D P Foley; W C Meyers; M P Callery
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Patterns of recurrence and survival after laparoscopic and conventional resections for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J E Hartley; B J Mehigan; A W MacDonald; P W Lee; J R Monson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

6.  Laparoscopic surgery for stage III colon cancer: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  M E Franklin; G B Kazantsev; D Abrego; J A Diaz-E; J Balli; J L Glass
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Results of laparoscopically assisted colon resection for carcinoma.

Authors:  C A Anderson; F R Kennedy; M Potter; H L Opie; S Flowers; S Lewis; M Belmont; D L Fowler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Early results of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Retrospective analysis of 372 patients treated by Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group.

Authors:  J W Fleshman; H Nelson; W R Peters; H C Kim; S Larach; R R Boorse; W Ambroze; P Leggett; R Bleday; S Stryker; B Christenson; S Wexner; A Senagore; D Rattner; J Sutton; A P Fine
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Wound recurrence following laparoscopic colon cancer resection. Results of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Laparoscopic Registry.

Authors:  P Vukasin; A E Ortega; F L Greene; G D Steele; A J Simons; G J Anthone; L A Weston; R W Beart
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Tumor recurrence in the abdominal wall scar tissue after large-bowel cancer surgery.

Authors:  E S Hughes; F T McDermott; A L Polglase; W R Johnson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  15 in total

1.  Multimedia article. Radical lymphadenectomy for advanced colon cancer via separation of the mesocolon into two layers as in filleting fish.

Authors:  Dai Uematsu; Gaku Akiyama; Akiko Magishi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A comparative study on the short-term clinicopathologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery for transverse colon cancer.

Authors:  H J Kim; I K Lee; Y S Lee; W K Kang; J K Park; S T Oh; J G Kim; Y H Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Marco Milone; Ugo Elmore; Enrico Di Salvo; Paolo Delrio; Luigi Bucci; Giuseppe Paolo Ferulano; Carmine Napolitano; Maria Rachele Angiolini; Umberto Bracale; Marco Clemente; Michele D'ambra; Gaetano Luglio; Mario Musella; Ugo Pace; Riccardo Rosati; Francesco Milone
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing two types of anastomosis.

Authors:  P Carnuccio; J Jimeno; D Parés
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-05-18       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  A totally mini-invasive approach for colorectal laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Gabriele Anania; Mirco Santini; Lucia Scagliarini; Alice Marzetti; Laura Vedana; Serafino Marino; Claudio Gregorio; Giuseppe Resta; Giorgio Cavallesco
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  Marco Scatizzi; Katrin C Kröning; Andrea Borrelli; Gordon Andan; Elisa Lenzi; Francesco Feroci
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Impact of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  M R E Abdel-Halim; H M Moore; P Cohen; P Dawson; G N Buchanan
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 8.  A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the role of laparoscopic surgical resection of transverse colon tumours.

Authors:  M Chand; M R S Siddiqui; S Rasheed; G Brown; P Tekkis; A Parvaiz; T Qureshi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Predictive factors for conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  N A Rotholtz; M Laporte; G Zanoni; M E Bun; L Aued; S Lencinas; N A Mezzadri; L Pereyra
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 10.  What is the best surgical procedure of transverse colon cancer? An evidence map and minireview.

Authors:  Chen Li; Quan Wang; Ke-Wei Jiang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.