Literature DB >> 26676111

Core value of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Xin-Xiang Li1, Ren-Jie Wang1.   

Abstract

Since laparoscopy was first used in cholecystectomy in 1987, it has developed quickly and has been used in most fields of traditional surgery. People have now accepted its advantages like small incision, quick recovery, light pain, beauty and short hospital stays. In early times, there are still controversies about the application of laparoscopy in malignant tumor treatments, especially about the problems of oncology efficacy, incision implantation and operation security. However, these concerns have been fully eliminated by evidences on the basis of evidence-basis medicine. In recent years, new minimally invasive technologies are appearing continually, but they still have challenges and may increase the difficulties of radical dissection and the risks of potential complications, so they are confined to benign or early malignant tumors. The core value of the laparoscopic technique is to ensure the high quality of tumor's radical resection and less complications. On the basis of this, it is allowed to pursue more minimally invasive techniques. Since the development of laparoscopic colorectal surgery is rapid and unceasing, we have reasons to believe that laparoscopic surgery will become gold standard for colorectal surgery in the near future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Core value; Laparoscopic colorectal surgery; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery

Year:  2015        PMID: 26676111      PMCID: PMC4673392          DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i18.1295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc


  12 in total

1.  Wound recurrences following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for cancer.

Authors:  L Stocchi; H Nelson
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-08

Review 2.  Laparoscopy for rectal cancer reduces short-term mortality and morbidity: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Arezzo; Roberto Passera; Gitana Scozzari; Mauro Verra; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Patterns of recurrence and survival after laparoscopic and conventional resections for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J E Hartley; B J Mehigan; A W MacDonald; P W Lee; J R Monson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy.

Authors:  F J Berends; G Kazemier; H J Bonjer; J F Lange
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-07-02       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Ka Lau Leung; Samuel P Y Kwok; Steve C W Lam; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Simon S M Ng; Paul B S Lai; Wan Yee Lau
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Juan C García-Valdecasas; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Pilar Taurá; Josep M Piqué; Josep Visa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Laparoscopy in 533 patients with abdominal malignancy.

Authors:  D B Pearlstone; P F Mansfield; S A Curley; M Kumparatana; P Cook; B W Feig
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  1 in total

1.  Validation of a novel virtual reality simulation system with the focus on training for surgical dissection during laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy.

Authors:  Takashi Mori; Koji Ikeda; Nobuyoshi Takeshita; Koichi Teramura; Masaaki Ito
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.