Literature DB >> 12454514

Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome.

Marco Braga1, Andrea Vignali, Luca Gianotti, Walter Zuliani, Giovanni Radaelli, Paola Gruarin, Paolo Dellabona, Valerio Di Carlo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary endpoint was to compare the impact of laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery on 30-day postoperative morbidity. Lymphocyte proliferation to mitogens and gut oxygen tension were surrogate endpoints. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Evidence-based proof of the effect of laparoscopic colorectal surgery on immunometabolic response and clinically relevant outcome variables is scanty. Further randomized trials are desirable before proposing laparoscopy as a superior technique.
METHODS: Two hundred sixty-nine patients with colorectal disease were randomly assigned to laparoscopic (n = 136) or open (n = 133) colorectal resection. Four trained members of the surgical staff who were not involved in the study registered postoperative complications. Lymphocyte proliferation to Candida albicans and phytohemagglutinin was evaluated before and 3 and 15 days after surgery. Operative gut oxygen tension was monitored continuously by a polarographic microprobe.
RESULTS: In the laparoscopic group the conversion rate was 5.1%. The overall morbidity rate was 20.6% in the laparoscopic group and 38.3% in the open group. Postoperative infections occurred in 15 of the 136 patients in the laparoscopic group and 31 of the 133 patients in the open group. The mean length of hospital stay was 10.4 +/- 2.9 days in the laparoscopic group and 12.5 +/- 4.1 days in the open group. On postoperative day 3, lymphocyte proliferation was impaired in both groups. Fifteen days after surgery, the proliferation index returned to baseline values only in the laparoscopic group. Intraoperative gut oxygen tension was higher in the laparoscopic than in the open group.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery resulted in a significant reduction of 30-day postoperative morbidity. Lymphocyte proliferation and gut oxygen tension were better preserved in the laparoscopic group than in the open group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12454514      PMCID: PMC1422642          DOI: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000036269.60340.AE

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  48 in total

Review 1.  Effect of laparoscopy on intra-abdominal blood flow.

Authors:  M Schäfer; L Krähenbühl
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Systemic cytokine response after laparoscopic-assisted resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  K L Leung; P B Lai; R L Ho; W C Meng; R Y Yiu; J F Lee; W Y Lau
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  A prospective randomized trial on heart rate variability of the surgical team during laparoscopic and conventional sigmoid resection.

Authors:  B Böhm; N Rötting; W Schwenk; S Grebe; U Mansmann
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-03

4.  Comparative evaluation of surgical stress of laparoscopic and open surgeries for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  K Nishiguchi; J Okuda; M Toyoda; K Tanaka; N Tanigawa
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Early postoperative enteral nutrition improves gut oxygenation and reduces costs compared with total parenteral nutrition.

Authors:  M Braga; L Gianotti; O Gentilini; V Parisi; C Salis; V Di Carlo
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Patterns of recurrence and survival after laparoscopic and conventional resections for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  J E Hartley; B J Mehigan; A W MacDonald; P W Lee; J R Monson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Laparoscopic-assisted resection of right-sided colonic carcinoma: a case-control study.

Authors:  K L Leung; W C Meng; J F Lee; K H Thung; P B Lai; W Y Lau
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Inflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections - results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  W Schwenk; C Jacobi; U Mansmann; B Böhm; J M Müller
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Altered microperfusion at the rectal stump is predictive for rectal anastomotic leak.

Authors:  A Vignali; L Gianotti; M Braga; G Radaelli; L Malvezzi; V Di Carlo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Laparoscopic-assisted surgery for Crohn's disease: reduced surgical stress following ileocolectomy.

Authors:  D Kishi; R Nezu; T Ito; E Taniguchi; T Momiyama; S Obunai; S Ohashi; H Matsuda
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

View more
  155 in total

1.  A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  A Rawlinson; P Kang; J Evans; A Khanna
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Laparoscopic management of diverticular disease.

Authors:  Jeremy M Lipman; Harry L Reynolds
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-08

3.  Risk of clinical leak after laparoscopic versus open bowel anastomosis.

Authors:  Galal El-Gazzaz; Daniel Geisler; Tracy Hull
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A minimally invasive approach to the placement of tissue expanders.

Authors:  Brent M Egeland; Paul S Cederna
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Laparoscopic surgery for palliative resection of the primary tumor in incurable stage IV colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hideaki Nishigori; Masaaki Ito; Yuji Nishizawa; Atsushi Kohyama; Takamaru Koda; Kentaro Nakajima; Yusuke Nishizawa; Akihiro Kobayashi; Masanori Sugito; Norio Saito
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Short-term outcomes following reduced-port, single-port, and multi-port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: tailored laparoscopic approaches based on tumor size and nodal status.

Authors:  Hyeon Yu; Jin Yong Shin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Short- and long-term costs of laparoscopic colectomy are significantly less than open colectomy.

Authors:  David P Eisenberg; Jane Wey; Philip Q Bao; Melissa Saul; Andrew R Watson; Wolfgang H Schraut; Kenneth K W Lee; A James Moser; Steven J Hughes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Niraj Parikh; Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic vs open total colectomy: a case-matched comparative study.

Authors:  N Pokala; C P Delaney; A J Senagore; K M Brady; V W Fazio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.