Literature DB >> 9888738

Aortic enhancement during abdominal CT angiography: correlation with test injections, flow rates, and patient demographics.

J F Platt1, K A Reige, J H Ellis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of our study was to determine the effect of contrast material injection rate and patient demographic variables on vascular enhancement for abdominal CT angiography and compare test injection results with actual patterns of vascular enhancement. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-five patients underwent abdominal CT angiography. For each patient, CT attenuation values (Hounsfield units) of the aorta were determined before and after IV contrast administration, every 3 sec between 21 and 60 sec. A peak aortic enhancement value and the time needed to reach peak and aortic enhancement thresholds of 150 and 200 H were determined. All patients received 150 ml of nonionic contrast material at 3 ml/sec in 25 patients and 4 ml/sec in 100 patients. A test injection of 15 ml was used to compute a scan delay in 46 patients. Patient age, sex, weight, injection rate, and test injection results were compared with vascular enhancement patterns.
RESULTS: For the 125 patients, the mean aortic enhancement at each time point was greater than 150 H. Patient weight was inversely correlated (r2 = -.62) with aortic enhancement. The test injection did not accurately predict actual aortic enhancement peak value or time. Test injection delay time was significantly correlated with time to reach aortic enhancement thresholds of 150 and 200 H. The 4 ml/sec rate resulted in a higher peak aortic enhancement (320+/-58 H versus 281+/-49 H) (mean +/- SD, p < .01) that was reached quicker than with the 3 ml/sec injection rate (45+/-5 sec versus 52+/-5 sec) (p < .01). Injecting at 4 ml/sec resulted in greater aortic enhancement values at 24-45 sec, whereas 3 ml/sec produced significantly better aortic enhancement at 54-60 sec.
CONCLUSION: The test injection correlated better with time to reach specific aortic enhancement thresholds than with time to peak aortic enhancement. For a given amount of contrast material, faster injection rates resulted in greater vascular enhancement that occurred earlier.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 9888738     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.172.1.9888738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  24 in total

1.  Measurement of cardiac output from a test-bolus injection in multislice computed tomography.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Ernst Klotz; Anja Hennemuth; Bettina Jung; Ralf Koos; Joachim E Wildberger; Rolf W Günther
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison of two contrast materials with different iodine concentrations in enhancing the density of the the aorta, portal vein and liver at multi-detector row CT: a randomized study.

Authors:  Hiromasa Suzuki; Hidekazu Oshima; Norio Shiraki; Chisa Ikeya; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Iodine quantification with dual-energy CT: phantom study and preliminary experience with VX2 residual tumour in rabbits after radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Y Li; G Shi; S Wang; S Wang; R Wu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Multi-detector row CT of the head and neck: comparison of different volumes of contrast material with and without a saline chaser.

Authors:  Dae Young Yoon; Su Yeon You; Chul Soon Choi; Suk Ki Chang; Eun Joo Yun; Young Lan Seo; Sang Joon Park; Yu-Jin Lee; Jeung Hee Moon; Young-Soo Rho; Jin-Hwan Kim
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  [Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) of the kidneys].

Authors:  A J Ruppert-Kohlmayr; M M Uggowitzer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Quantitative prediction of contrast enhancement from test bolus data in cardiac MSCT.

Authors:  Andreas H Mahnken; Annabella Rauscher; Ernst Klotz; Georg Mühlenbruch; Marco Das; Rolf W Günther; Joachim E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  MDCT angiography of the pulmonary arteries: intravascular contrast enhancement does not depend on iodine concentration when injecting equal amounts of iodine at standardized iodine delivery rates.

Authors:  S Keil; C Plumhans; F F Behrendt; M Das; S Stanzel; G Mühlenbruch; P Seidensticker; C Knackstedt; A H Mahnken; R W Günther; J E Wildberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Contrast medium injection protocol adjusted for body surface area in combined PET/CT.

Authors:  Florian F Behrendt; Marilou Rebière; Andreas Goedicke; Hubertus Pietsch; Karin Palmowski; Christiane K Kuhl; Felix M Mottaghy; Frederik A Verburg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Contrast material injection protocol with the flow rate adjusted to the heart rate for dual source CT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Xiaomei Zhu; Wenping Chen; Mei Li; Yi Xu; Hai Xu; Yinsu Zhu; Dehang Wang; Lijun Tang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.357

10.  Introduction of an individually optimized protocol for the injection of contrast medium for coronary CT angiography.

Authors:  Harald Seifarth; Michael Puesken; John F Kalafut; Susanne Wienbeck; Johannes Wessling; David Maintz; Walter Heindel; Kai-Uwe Juergens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.