Literature DB >> 9876727

Videolaparocholecystectomy: casuistry of 1000 cases.

E Fahel1, P C Amaral, E M Azaro Filho, E L Souza, M F Fortes, R S Alcântara, J E Ettinger, A B Régis, W G Fogagnoli, M M Sousa, A G Cunha, M M Castro.   

Abstract

Despite the ongoing evolution in the medical treatment of biliary pathology, the standard of treatment for gallstones remains cholecystectomy. There are no alternative treatments that have shown the same efficacy as surgery. Current alternative treatments have shown high recurrence and failure rates. Cholecystectomy remains the gold standard for management of gallstones. The surgical access of laparoscopic cholecystectomy accomplished by Mouret in 1987 allows for a reduction in operative trauma, hospital stay, postoperative pain and convalescence. These factors permit a faster return to normal activities. Today, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is performed in almost all medical centers around the world; however, the procedure is not free of complications. The objective of this study was to analyze our first 1000 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, giving emphasis to the morbidity and mortality of the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9876727      PMCID: PMC3015283     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JSLS        ISSN: 1086-8089            Impact factor:   2.172


MATERIALS AND METHODS

The first 1000 cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy per-formed between January 1992 and July 1997 by the surgical staff of the São Rafael hospital in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil were analyzed retrospectively. There was no selection criteria among patients. These cases represent the first 1000 patients submitted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in this hospital. Laparoscopic technique followed that of the European school. A Veress needle was inserted via the umbilicus as a closed technique in the majority of cases. Pneumoperitoneum was induced and maintained by an automatic CO2 insufflator maintaining endoabdominal pressure less than 15 mm Hg. An open or Hasson technique was used to establish pneumoperitoneum in cases with previous surgery, abdominal distention or difficulties with percutaneous insertion of the Veress needle. The first trocar was placed at the umbilicus (10 mm) and the others were inserted under direct vision in the epigastrium (5 mm), mesogastrium (10 mm) and right flank (5 mm). A 25° laparoscopic optic was used to provide all-around vision. Intraoperative cholangiography was indicated in patients with anatomic variations, jaundice, biliary dilatation, acute pancreatitis or an increase in liver enzymes when endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) could not be performed preoperatively. Cholangiographic technique included introduction of a long intravenous catheter needle in the right hypochondrium, catheterization of the cystic duct, and fixation of the catheter with metal clips. The following data were generated: age, gender, previous surgery, surgical risk, clinical symptoms, laboratory evaluation, intraoperative findings and procedures, morbidity and mortality, conversion to open technique, operative time, and hospital stay.

RESULTS

The authors retrospectively analyzed the first 1000 patients operated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our hospital. The minimum age was 13 years, and the maximum age was 90 years, with an average age of 47.4 years. There were 213 males (21.3%) and 787 females (78,7%) ( Demographics of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy - analysis of 1000 cases. A history of previous abdominal surgery was found in 48.1% of the patients (481). Twenty-one (2.1%) of these patients had upper abdominal surgery. In six cases it was impossible to access the gallbladder due to adhesions, and the surgery was completed by a conventional approach (. The criteria used for operative risk evaluation was established by the American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA). Thirty-six (3.6%) patients had high surgical risk (III, IV and V ASA); meanwhile, 966 (96.6%) patients were at a lower surgical risk (I and II ASA) (. A total of 145 (14.5%) patients required subhepatic drainage (. This was performed in cases where the dissection between gallbladder and liver was difficult, leading to question if there were accessory bile ducts or postoperative hemorrhage. The drain, generally, was removed on the first postoperative day. The most common complaint was right hypochondrium pain ( present in 594 (59.4%) of the patients. Inflammation signs, such as fever and leukocytosis, were present in 89 (8.9%) and 151 (15.1%) patients, respectively. A total of 18 (1.8%) patients with leukocytosis presented with a left shift; nevertheless, 35.8% had no abnormal physical signs. Absolute and relative symptomatology and laboratorial evaluation - analysis of 1000 cases. Culture of the bile was obtained systematically by aspiration of the gallbladder during or after extraction from the abdominal cavity. Seventy-four (7.4%) of the bile cultures were positive for at least one bacteria (. Isolated bacterias in positive cultures - analysis of 1000 cases. Patients with suspected Choledocholithiasis were submitted to ERCP prior to surgery. When it was not achievable, intraoperative laparoscopic cholangiography was performed. Cholangiography was also obtained in cases where the anatomy was obscure. Fifty-one patients (5.1%) had cholangiography, and choledocholithiasis was found in three patients (0.3%) (. Two patients were submitted to laparotomy plus common bile duct exploration. In our last patient with choledocholithiasis we performed choledochotomy and common duct explo-ration by laparoscopic means. In all of the patients, a T-tube was placed and removed after two weeks. The mean time of surgery was 86 minutes. Thirteen (1.3%) patients had intraoperative complications (, with 0.1% (one patient) of mortality due to pulmonary embolism. Intraoperative complications - analysis of 1000 cases. Conversion was required in 21 patients (2.1%). outlines the causes of conversion to open technique. Postoperative complications occurred in 37 patients (3.7%) (. The average hospital stay was 2.17 days. outlines the histological aspects of the gall-bladders removed. Causes of conversion to open technique - analysis of 1000 cases. Postoperative complications - analysis of 1000 cases. Histological aspects of the gallbladders - analysi s of 1000 cases.

DISCUSSION

There are limitations imposed by a retrospective study. This analysis was based on a standard procedure performed at one center contributing as a serial report with a significant N for a study with this characteristic. There is consensus in the literature that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the procedure of choice in the treatment of gallbladder stones with a low rate of conversion (2.1% in our casuistry). Intraoperative complications were: cystic duct lesion (3 cases - 0.3%) managed by putting the clip below it; cystic artery lesion (2 cases -0.2%), also managed by the use of a clip after identification of the bleeding vessel; and liver parenchyma lesion in two patients (0.2%) solved by electrocoagulation. There were two duodenal injuries (0.2%): the first occurred during its traction with a suction device, and the second was due to contact with the unprotected tip of the electrocautery. Both cases were diagnosed postoperatively and were treated by laparotomy and primary suture of the lesions. They had no further complications. A injury of the large bowel occurred during placement of the first trocar. The patient had no abdominal scars or distention. The diagnosis was made when the camera passed into the lumen of the large bowel. This complication was managed by placing two others trocars and extracting the injured large bowel out of the abdominal cavity through the umbilicus, with the aid of an intestinal clamp. After suture repair, the large bowel was reintroduced into the abdominal cavity and a 20 mm trocar was placed in the umbilicus to complete the cholecystectomy by laparoscopic means. Pneumo-omentum occurred in one patient (0.1%) and was treated with conservative measures. Gallbladder rupture occurred in one patient (0.1%) and was managed with copious peritoneal lavage with no further complications. A common hepatic duct injury was encountered in one patient (0.1%) who had a scleroatrophic gallbladder. The treatment involved an end-to-end choledocholedochostomy anastomosis. One death occurred in a 24-year-old female patient who developed a bile peritonitis in the postoperative period due to leakage from a duct of Luschka. The patient developed sepsis and was submitted to laparotomy at which time biliary peritonitis was found. The duct was identified and closed. The patient was sent to ICU where she remained for five days. One day before anticipated hospital discharge she developed clinical symptoms of pulmonary embolism and died. The conversion rate was 2.1% due to: nine anatomical variations (42.8% of the total conversions), six adhesions (28.6%), two cholecystoduodenal fistulas (9.5%); two hypertension (9.5%); one common hepatic duct injury (4.8%); and one CO2 retention (4.8%).

Management of the Postoperative Complications:

Atelectasis was treated with respiratory physiotherapy, respiratory infection by respiratory physiotherapy and antibiotics. Bile peritonitis was managed by laparotomy, lavage and drainage in the first two cases. The remaining three cases were treated by re-laparoscopy, and in one of these cases we were able to identify the bile duct on the liver parenchyma that was sutured. Bile leak occurred in two patients, and in both cases the drain was left in place until the leak stopped. One subhepatic hematoma and subphrenic collection was treated with a conservative non-operative approach, with good results. Respiratory insufficiency occurred in one patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Wound infection occurred in two patients, both of whom were operated on for acute cholecystitis. In these two cases the gallbladder touched the abdominal wall during its withdrawal. Four residual stones were found. All of theses patients were submitted to ERCP with successful extraction of the stones. One patient, who had no history of peptic ulcer disease, experienced a perforated duodenal ulcer on the first postoperative day. This patient was treated by laparotomy with suture of the perforation.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been found to be a safe method with a low rate of morbidity and mortality and is comparable to traditional cholecystectomy. Many advantages are realized with the laparoscopic method such as a reduction in operative trauma, hospital stay, postoperative pain and convalescence period allowing a faster return to normal activities. Our data are consistent with the reported literature.
Table 1.

Demographics of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy - analysis of 1000 cases.

CharacteristicValue
N1000 patients
Age13 - 90 (mean 47.4)
Male213 (21.3%)
Female787 (78.7%)
Previous surgery481 (48.1%)
Upper abdomen surgery21 (2.1%)
Difficult access due to adhesion6 (0.6%)
ASA 1604 (60.4%)
ASA 2362 (36.2%)
ASA 332 (3.2%)
ASA 42 (0.2%)
Subhepatic drainage145 (14.5%)
Leukocytosis151 (15.1%)
Positive culture74 (7.4%)
Cholangiography51 (5.1%)
Choledocholithiasis3 (0.3%)
Mean operative time86 minutes
Intraoperative complications13 (1.3%)
Conversion to open technique21 (2.1%)
Postoperative complications37 (3.7%)
Mortality1 (0.1%)
Hospital stay2.17 days
Table 2.

Absolute and relative symptomatology and laboratorial evaluation - analysis of 1000 cases.

CharacteristicValue
Right superior quadrant pain594 (59.4%)
Fever89 (8.9%)
Palpable gallbladder29 (2.9%)
Leukocytosis151 (15.1%)
Shift to left18 (1.8%)
Table 3.

Isolated bacterias in positive cultures - analysis of 1000 cases.

BacteriaValue
Klebsiella16 (21.6%)
Escherichia coli15 (20.3%)
Enterobacter sp13 (17.6%)
Citrobacter5 (6.8%)
Bastonete gram positive5 (6.8%)
Salmonella sp.3 (4.1%)
Serratia marcencens3 (4.1%)
Pseudomonas3 (4.1%)
Acinetobacter3 (4.1%)
Bastonete gram negative2 (2.7%)
Aerococcus1 (1.3%)
Bifido bacterium1 (1.3%)
Candida1 (1.3%)
Proteus1 (1.3%)
S. epidermidis1 (1.3%)
Staphylococcus1 (1.3%)

Total74 (7.4%)
Table 4.

Intraoperative complications - analysis of 1000 cases.

Intraoperative complicationValue
Cystic duct lesion3 (0.3%)
Cystic artery lesion2 (0.2%)
Liver parenchyma lesion2 (0.2%)
Duodenal lesion2 (0.2%)
Pneumo-omentum1 (0.1%)
Gallbladder rupture1 (0.1%)
Common hepatic duct lesion1 (0.1%)
Large bowel perforation1 (0.1%)

Total13 (1.3%)
Table 5.

Causes of conversion to open technique - analysis of 1000 cases.

CauseValue
Anatomic variation9 (42.8%)
Adhesion6 (28.6%)
Cholecystoduodenal fistula2 (9.5%)
Hypertension2 (9.5%)
CO2 retention1 (4.8%)
Common hepatic duct lesion1 (4.8%)

Total21 (2.1%)
Table 6.

Postoperative complications - analysis of 1000 cases.

Postoperative complicationsValue
Atelectasis13 (35.2%)
Respiratory infection5 (13.5%)
Choleperitoneum5 (13.5%)
Residual choledocholithiasis4 (10.8%)
Bilis leak2 (5.4%)
Wound infection2 (5.4%)
Subhepatic hematoma1 (2.7%)
Respiratory insufficiency1 (2.7%)
Subphrenic collection1 (2.7%)
Perforated ulcer1 (2.7%)
Pulmonary embolism1 (2.7%)
Death1 (2.7%)

Total37 (3.7%)
Table 7.

Histological aspects of the gallbladders - analysi s of 1000 cases.

HistologyValue
Chronic cholecystitis813 (81.3%)
Acute cholecystitis148 (14.8%)
Gallstone8 (0.8%)
Gallbladder adenocarcinoma7 (0.7%)
Sub-acute cholecystitis7 (0.7%)
Scleroatrophic gallbladder6 (0.6%)
Gallbladder polyp5 (0.5%)
Common duct Fibroxantoma1 (0.1%)
Normal gallbladder5 (0.5%)
  12 in total

1.  A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A requiem for the routine operative cholangiogram.

Authors:  A Gerber
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1986-10

3.  Selective vs routine use of intraoperative cholangiography. An argument.

Authors:  M D Pasquale; R J Nauta
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1989-09

4.  Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases.

Authors:  D J Deziel; K W Millikan; S G Economou; A Doolas; S T Ko; M C Airan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 5.  Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography.

Authors:  E H Phillips
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the European experience.

Authors:  J Perissat
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 7.  Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  V S Lee; R S Chari; G Cucchiaro; W C Meyers
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 8.  New trends in gallstone management.

Authors:  S Cheslyn-Curtis; R C Russell
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Routine cholangiography is not warranted during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  D G Clair; D L Carr-Locke; J M Becker; D C Brooks
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1993-05

10.  Spectrum and management of major complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A M Ress; M G Sarr; D M Nagorney; M B Farnell; J H Donohue; D C McIlrath
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  3 in total

1.  A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited.

Authors:  Chris Collins; Donal Maguire; Adrian Ireland; Edward Fitzgerald; Gerald C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Acute cholecystitis: video-laparoscopic versus traditional treatment.

Authors:  P C Amaral; E M Azaro Filho; M P Galvão-Neto; M F Fortes; E L Souza; R S Alcântra; J E Ettinger; A B Regis; M M Sousa; V M do Carmo; P A Santana; E Fahel
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2001 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in elderly patients.

Authors:  Paulo Cézar Galvão do Amaral; Euler de Medeiros Azaro Filho; Thales Delmondes Galvão; João Eduardo Marques de Menezes Ettinger; Jadson Murilo Silva Reis; Marcos Lima; Edvaldo Fahel
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.