Literature DB >> 8480891

Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography.

E H Phillips1.   

Abstract

Since its introduction 60 years ago, intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) has reduced the incidence of unnecessary common bile duct (CBD) explorations from 66% to less than 5%. However, the use of routine IOC during cholecystectomy remains controversial. Routine IOC during laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduces the incidence, level, and severity of bile duct injuries. Performing routine IOC with CBD exploration eliminates the need for postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or endoscopic sphincterotomy in the 1.4% to 3.5% of postoperative patients with abdominal pain or retained stones, thereby also eliminating the need for reoperation after failed endoscopic sphincterotomy. The financial cost of routine IOC is equal to or less than the cost of treating the severe bile duct injuries that are prevented as well as the cost of the work-up and treatment of patients with retained stones who have not had IOC. A policy of routine IOC sets operative priorities and improves the surgical skills that are necessary for laparoscopic transcystic duct CBD exploration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8480891     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80950-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  21 in total

1.  Intraoperative cholangiography in the laparoscopic cholecystectomy era: why are we still debating?

Authors:  F Ausania; L R Holmes; F Ausania; S Iype; P Ricci; S A White
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a survey of 2,130 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Nickkholgh; S Soltaniyekta; H Kalbasi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Costs and utilization of intraoperative cholangiography.

Authors:  Edward H Livingston; Jordan A G Miller; Brian Coan; Robert V Rege
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  One hundred consecutive laparoscopic cholangiograms. Results and conclusions.

Authors:  B J Carroll; E H Phillips; R Rosenthal; S Gleischman; J F Bray
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Recognition of laparoscopic bile duct injuries by intraoperative ultrasonography.

Authors:  M Birth; B J Carroll; K Delinikolas; M Eichler; H Weiser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Surgery for common bile duct stones--a lost surgical skill; still worthwhile in the minimally invasive century?

Authors:  Harald Puhalla; Nathan Flint; Nicholas O'Rourke
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Incisionless fluorescent cholangiography (IFC): a pilot survey of surgeons on procedural familiarity, practices, and perceptions.

Authors:  Fernando Dip; Luis Sarotto; Mayank Roy; Aaron Lee; Emanuelle LoMenzo; Matthew Walsh; Thomas Carus; Sylke Schneider; Luigi Boni; Takeaki Ishizawa; Nohiro Kokudo; Kevin White; Raul J Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Impact of practice patterns in shunt use during carotid endarterectomy with contralateral carotid occlusion.

Authors:  Philip P Goodney; Jessica B Wallaert; Salvatore T Scali; David H Stone; Virendra Patel; Palma Shaw; Brian W Nolan; Jack L Cronenwett
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  The laparoscopic cholangiogram of doom.

Authors:  B J Carroll
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic choledochoscopy with a small-caliber endoscope. A safe and effective technique for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  W E Kelley; V C Sheridan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.