Literature DB >> 17575761

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in elderly patients.

Paulo Cézar Galvão do Amaral1, Euler de Medeiros Azaro Filho, Thales Delmondes Galvão, João Eduardo Marques de Menezes Ettinger, Jadson Murilo Silva Reis, Marcos Lima, Edvaldo Fahel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis is the major complication of biliary lithiasis, for which laparoscopic treatment has been established as the standard therapy. With longer life expectancy, acute cholecystitis has often been seen in elderly patients (>65 years old) and is often accompanied by comorbity and severe complications. We sought to compare the outcome of laparoscopic treatment for acute cholecystitis with special focus on comparison between elderly and nonelderly patients.
METHOD: This study was a prospective analysis of 190 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to acute cholecystitis or chronic acute cholecystitis, comparing elderly and nonelderly patients.
RESULTS: Of 190 patients, 39 (21%) were elderly (>65 years old) and 151 (79%) were not elderly (< or =65 years), with conversion rates of 10.3% and 6.6% (P=0.49), respectively. The incidence of postoperative complications in elderly and nonelderly patients were the following, respectively: atelectasis 5.1% and 2.0% (P=0.27); respiratory infection 5.1% and 2.7% (P=0.6); bile leakage 5.1% and 2.0% (P=0.27), and intraabdominal abscess 1 case (0.7%) and no incidence (P = 1).
CONCLUSION: According to our data, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and efficient procedure for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in patients older than 65 years of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17575761      PMCID: PMC3015745     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JSLS        ISSN: 1086-8089            Impact factor:   2.172


INTRODUCTION

Elderly patients who undergo surgery have more postoperative complications and prolonged hospital stay.[1–;5] Acute cholecystitis is the second most common cause of inflammatory acute abdomen, and the laparoscopic approach is the standard treatment.[6-10] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has the advantages of less pain, shorter hospital stay, early return to work, and minimal invasiveness compared with laparotomy.[4,11-24] Because of these advantages, LC represents a beneficial therapeutic approach to acute cholecystitis in elderly patients.[5,13,19,24,25,26] The goal of this study was to compare the benefits of LC in the treatment of elderly and nonelderly patients with acute or chronic acute cholecystitis.

METHODS

The study was conducted at the General Surgery Service of the São Rafael Hospital, Salvador-BA, Brazil. During a 10-year period, 1864 patients admitted for emergency or elective surgery underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy due to biliary lithiasis. All patients who had acute cholecystitis or chronic acute cholecystitis in pathology studies were included in the study. Patients diagnosed with choledocholithiasis, biliary pancreatitis, acalculous cholecystitis, and gallbladder cancer or polyps were excluded from the study. The patients underwent surgery after complete preoperative evaluation (blood analysis, chest radiography, and electrocardiogram when necessary) and ultrasonography with biliary lithiasis. The surgery was performed with the patient under general anesthesia. First-generation cephalosporin was the prophylactic antibiotic used. The same surgical team performed all laparoscopies. We do not generally perform cholangiography as a routine procedure in our service. Those patients who had jaundice or dilated common biliary duct on ultrasonography underwent magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for study of the biliary tree. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to age. Patients >65 years were assigned to Group 1, and patients ≤65 years were assigned to Group 2. The following data were obtained: age, sex, symptoms, physical examination, severity criteria, American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification Grading (ASA), conversion rate, postoperative complications (related or not related to the surgery site), and death rate. A longitudinal study and analyses of collected data were performed prospectively from hospital records on a standard form. We used the software SPSS for Windows (version 10.0) for statistical analyses. For univariate analysis, the variables described above were analyzed by the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, when appropriate. Continuous variables were analyzed by the Student t test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of the 1,864 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we selected the patients who had acute cholecystitis or chronic acute cholecystitis based on the pathology studies for a total of 190 patients. There were 39 (21%) elderly patients, >65 years old, (Group 1) and 151 (79%) nonelderly patients, ≤65 years, (Group 2). Females predominated in both groups: 28 (71.8%) in Group 1 and 109 (72.2%) in Group 2. lists the symptoms and signs on physical examination and their degree of occurrence experienced by elderly and nonelderly patients with acute cholecystitis. Abdominal pain was the most significant symptom. Vomiting was the second most frequent symptom. In Group 1, only 13 (33.3%) patients had previous symptoms of cholelithiasis, while in Group 2, 60 (39.7%) patients had such symptoms. Signs and Symptoms of Elderly and Nonelderly Patients With Acute Cholecystitis The most frequent comorbidities in the elderly group were hypertension and other cardiac diseases (P=0.001) (. Comorbidity in Elderly and Nonelderly Patients With Acute Cholecystitis In the elderly group, 7 (17.9%) smokers were identified, and 31 (20.5%) smokers were identified in Group 2 (P=0.82). Alcohol abuse was identified among 6 (15.4%) of the elderly patients and 22 (14.6%) of the nonelderly patients (P=1). In the evaluation of severity criteria, leukocytosis, jaundice, and fever were observed in both study groups (. Gravity Criteria for Elderly and Nonelderly Patients With Acute Cholecystitis During the anesthetic risk evaluation, ASA 2 predominance was observed in Group 1 (21 or 58.3%) and ASA 1 predominance was seen in Group 2 (74 or 56.7%) (. Anesthetic Risk for Elderly and Nonelderly Patients With Acute Cholecystitis American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification grading. Conversion to open surgery was necessary in 4 (10.3%) Group 1 patients and 10 (6.6%) Group 2 patients (P=0.49). Of all patients included in the study (190 patients), 117 (61.6%) cases of acute cholecystitis and 73 (38.4%) cases of chronic acute cholecystitis were documented by the pathology studies. The complications were divided as related or not related to the surgical site. The most frequent complication related to the surgical site, in both groups, was bile leakage, with 2 (5.1%) cases in the elderly group and 3 (2.0%) cases in the nonelderly group (P=0.27). One (0.7%) case of intraabdominal abscess occurred in Group 2 (P=1) and none in Group 1. Of the complications not related to the surgical site, respiratory infection, atelectasis, and sepsis occurred (. Nonrelated Surgical Site Complications for Elderly and Nonelderly Patients With Acute Cholecystitis One death occurred in each group, representing 2.6% for the elderly patient group and 0.7% for the nonelderly group.

DISCUSSION

Laparoscopy has been used in several surgical arenas to obtain minimal invasiveness for the treatment of surgical pathologies.[27-29] Bingener et al[1] reported conversion rates of 17% in elderly patients, which decreased during the study to 7%. The decrease in conversion rates depends on inherent factors of the patients and on the surgeons’ experience; with an increase in laparoscopic skills, conversion rates generally decrease.[11,20,30] Reports[1,20,25,29,31-34] mention conversion rates of LC to conventional surgery between 3.6% and 20% for the elderly patients with a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. In our study, we had a 10.3% conversion rate in elderly patients with cholecystitis and 6.6% in nonelderly patients (P=0.49). Therefore, our conversion rate coincides with that reported in the literature, and the conversion rates were not affected by patient age. Concerning nonrelated surgical site complications, 2 (5.1%) patients had respiratory infection, 2 (5.1%) patients had atelectasis, and 1(2.6%) patient had sepsis in the elderly group after LC. Our work demonstrates variations of 2% to 4% for respiratory infection, 1.4% to 4% for atelectasis, and 0% to 1% for sepses.[1,11,18,34] All of the nonrelated surgical site complications observed in this study were larger than the conversion rates. Bile leakage was the main complication related to surgical site, with 2 (5.1%) cases in the elderly patients and 3 (2.0%) in the nonelderly. Values around 0.5% to 2% and 5% were described in other series, respectively.[1,12,35] One (0.7%) case of intraabdominal abscess occurred in Group 2 and none in Group 1. Values around 0.5% to 1% were reported in the literature.[1,11,18,34] In the elderly group, the death rate was 2.6%, and in the nonelderly group it was 0.7%. The literature[1,3,16,20,25,35] reports mortality rates between 0% and 1.4% in patients older than 65. In this work, we obtained elevated conversion rates, surgical and nonsurgical postoperative complications, and death rates in the elderly group compared with those of the nonelderly group, with no statistical significance. In addition, our conversion rates are comparable to those reported in the literature, demonstrating that the use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in patients >65 years of age.

CONCLUSION

According to our data, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and efficient procedure for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in patients >65 years of age.
Table 1.

Signs and Symptoms of Elderly and Nonelderly Patients With Acute Cholecystitis

Elderly (Group 1; N = 39)Nonelderly (Group 2; N = 151)P
Symptoms
    Abdominal pain36 (92.3%)139 (92.1%)1.0
    Right upper abdominal quadrant pain26 (74.3%)87 (63.5%)0.36
    Epigastric pain5 (14.3%)39 (28.5%)0.36
    Colic pain14 (43.8%)64 (54.7%)0.47
    Upper abdominal pain1 (2.9%)1 (0.7%)0.36
    Vomiting21 (53.8%)81 (53.6%)1.0
Physical Exam
    Right upper abdominal quadrant pain31 (79.5%)113 (74.8%)0.67
    Wall rigidity4 (10.3%)4 (2.6%)0.57
    Palpable vesicle5 (12.8%)12 (7.9%)0.35
    Murphy6 (15.4%)41 (27.2%)0.14
Table 2.

Comorbidity in Elderly and Nonelderly Patients With Acute Cholecystitis

Elderly Group 1Nonelderly Group 2P
Diabetes mellitus6 (15.4%)4 (2.6%)0.06
Cardiac diseases10 (25.6%)4 (2.6%)0.001
Hypertension20 (51.3%)37 (24.5%)0.002
Table 3.

Gravity Criteria for Elderly and Nonelderly Patients With Acute Cholecystitis

ElderlyNonelderlyP
Leukocytosis61.5%49.7%0.21
Fever28.2%16.6%0.11
Jaundice15.4%6%0.08
Table 4.

Anesthetic Risk for Elderly and Nonelderly Patients With Acute Cholecystitis

ASA Classification*Elderly (Group 1)Nonelderly (Group 2)
I13.1%56.7%
II58.3%28.2%
III19%6.8%
IV0%0.8%

American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification grading.

Table 5.

Nonrelated Surgical Site Complications for Elderly and Nonelderly Patients With Acute Cholecystitis

ComplicationElderly (Group 1)Nonelderly (Group 2)P
Respiratory Infection2 (5.1%)4 (2.7%)0.6
Atelectasia2 (5.1%)3 (2.0%)0.27
Sepsis1 (2.6%)3 (2.0%)1
  32 in total

1.  [The clinical assessment of central hemodynamics in patients over 70 undergoing the surgical treatment of calculous cholecystitis].

Authors:  B I Miroshnikov; L I Davidovskaia
Journal:  Vestn Khir Im I I Grek       Date:  1998

2.  [Biliary surgery in persons older than 70 years of age].

Authors:  M Pazur
Journal:  Lijec Vjesn       Date:  1984-04

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis: retrospective study.

Authors:  C H Chau; C N Tang; W T Siu; J P Y Ha; M K W Li
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.227

4.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in octogenarians.

Authors:  D Hazzan; N Geron; D Golijanin; P Reissman; E Shiloni
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  [Characteristics of chronic calculous cholecystitis in young persons and in patients of older age groups].

Authors:  D I Krivitskiĭ; N N Gvozdiak; N G Poliakov; A A Nikishenko
Journal:  Vestn Khir Im I I Grek       Date:  1985-04

6.  Surgical management of acute cholecystitis in patients 65 years of age and older.

Authors:  F Glenn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in geriatric patients.

Authors:  James Majeski
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Does a special interest in laparoscopy affect the treatment of acute cholecystitis?

Authors:  L S Feldman; L E Medeiros; J Hanley; H H Sigman; J Garzon; G M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for elderly patients: gold standard for golden years?

Authors:  Juliane Bingener; Melanie L Richards; Wayne H Schwesinger; William E Strodel; Kenneth R Sirinek
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-05

10.  Non-traumatic acute abdomen: videolaparoscopic approach.

Authors:  E Fahel; P C Amaral; E M Filho; J E Ettinger; E L Souza; M F Fortes; R S Alcântara; A B Regis; M P Neto; M M Sousa; W G Fogagnoli; A G Cunha; M M Castro; P A Santana
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1999 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  8 in total

1.  Laparoscopic approach to acute abdomen from the Consensus Development Conference of the Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e nuove tecnologie (SICE), Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani (ACOI), Società Italiana di Chirurgia (SIC), Società Italiana di Chirurgia d'Urgenza e del Trauma (SICUT), Società Italiana di Chirurgia nell'Ospedalità Privata (SICOP), and the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES).

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Luca Ansaloni; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Carlo Bergamini; Fabio Cesare Campanile; Michele Carlucci; Giafranco Cocorullo; Alessio Corradi; Boris Franzato; Massimo Lupo; Vincenzo Mandalà; Antonino Mirabella; Graziano Pernazza; Micaela Piccoli; Carlo Staudacher; Nereo Vettoretto; Mauro Zago; Emanuele Lettieri; Anna Levati; Domenico Pietrini; Mariano Scaglione; Salvatore De Masi; Giuseppe De Placido; Marsilio Francucci; Monica Rasi; Abe Fingerhut; Selman Uranüs; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  SAGES guidelines for the clinical application of laparoscopic biliary tract surgery.

Authors:  D Wayne Overby; Keith N Apelgren; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The impact of frailty syndrome and risk scores on emergency cholecystectomy patients.

Authors:  Laura Lorenzon; Gianluca Costa; Giulia Massa; Barbara Frezza; Francesco Stella; Genoveffa Balducci
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Gallstone disease: current therapeutic practice.

Authors:  Chad I Williams; Eldon A Shaffer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04

5.  Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Elderly: An Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Western Nepal.

Authors:  Tika Ram Bhandari; Sudha Shahi; Rajeev Bhandari; Rajesh Poudel
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2017-05-10

6.  Perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sivesh K Kamarajah; Santhosh Karri; James R Bundred; Richard P T Evans; Aaron Lin; Tania Kew; Chinenye Ekeozor; Susan L Powell; Pritam Singh; Ewen A Griffiths
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Safe and feasible outcomes of cholecystectomy in extremely elderly patients (octogenarians vs. nonagenarians).

Authors:  Su Min Kim; Min Ho Shin; Nam Kyu Choi
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2021-09-15

8.  Evolution in the management of acute cholecystitis in the elderly: population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Tom Wiggins; Sheraz R Markar; Hugh Mackenzie; Sara Jamel; Alan Askari; Omar Faiz; Stavros Karamanakos; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.