Literature DB >> 9859886

The dependence of the distortion product 2f1-f2 on primary levels in non-impaired human ears.

S Dhar1, G R Long, N B Culpepper.   

Abstract

The optimal intensity relation between the two primaries used to generate Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (DPOAEs) in unimpaired human ears, over a clinically relevant intensity range, was evaluated using a commercially available clinical device. The ILO92 was used to determine the level of the DPOAE at 2f1-f2 for 16 combinations of primary levels in the range of 40 to 80 dB SPL from 40 unimpaired, young adult ears. Data were collected between 1 and 6 kHz at 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 kHz. The commonly used procedure of dropping data points less than 3 dB above the noise floor was compared to a power subtraction procedure. A multivariate ANOVA was performed to determine main effects of gender, ear, stimulus levels, frequencies, and interactions between stimulus levels and frequencies. An overall increase of DPOAE amplitude with increase in primary level was observed, along with a decrease of the optimal difference in primary levels as L2 was increased. Although the power subtraction and 3-dB drop paradigms yielded similar results at high stimulus levels, the power subtraction paradigm provided a more realistic indicator of DPOAE level when low level primaries were used. Possible mechanisms responsible for the level dependence of the optimal relationship between primaries and implications for clinical choice of primary levels are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9859886     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4106.1307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  8 in total

1.  Comparing behavioral and physiological measures of combination tones: sex and race differences.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Erin M Leshikar; Michelle D Hsieh; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sex differences in distortion-product and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions compared.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Glen K Martin; Barden B Stagner; Mindy M Maloney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effect of prenatal androgens on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in male and female sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Edward G Pasanen; Michelle D Valero; Eila K Roberts; Theresa M Lee
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.587

4.  Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Karen A Doherty; Laurel H Carney; Harshavardhana N Kikkeri
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Sexual Dimorphism in the Functional Development of the Cochlear Amplifier in Humans.

Authors:  Srikanta K Mishra; Samantha Zambrano; Hansapani Rodrigo
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 July/Aug       Impact factor: 3.562

6.  A new method for measuring the psychoacoustical properties of tinnitus.

Authors:  Bozena Kostek; Tomasz Poremski
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.644

7.  Association Analysis of Candidate Gene Polymorphisms and Audiometric Measures of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Young Musicians.

Authors:  Ishan Sunilkumar Bhatt; Raquel Dias; Nilesh Washnik; Jin Wang; O'neil Guthrie; Michael Skelton; Jeffery Lane; Jason Wilder
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.619

8.  Comparative multivariate analyses of transient otoacoustic emissions and distorsion products in normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Mirela Cristina Stamate; Nicolae Todor; Marcel Cosgarea
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2015-11-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.